File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/1759-7714.14528
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85131336552
- PMID: 35668712
- WOS: WOS:000806587900001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Survival benefits from afatinib compared with gefitinib and erlotinib among patients with common EGFR mutation in first-line setting
Title | Survival benefits from afatinib compared with gefitinib and erlotinib among patients with common EGFR mutation in first-line setting |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | afatinib erlotinib gefitinib osimertinib T790M |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | Thoracic Cancer, 2022, v. 13, n. 14, p. 2057-2063 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are recommended as first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations. The sequential use of different EGFR-TKIs has been reported to demonstrate improvement in overall survival of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. There are limited reports on comparisons between regimens with first-line use of afatinib, gefitinib or erlotinib, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with acquired T790M mutation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who received first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib treatment, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with acquired T790M mutation, was conducted. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line EGFR-TKI (PFS1) and time to second objective disease progression (PFS2) were compared among patients on different first-line EGFR-TKIs. Results: Among 155 patients, 101 (65.2%), 38 (24.5%) and 16 (10.3%) patients were on first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, respectively. Patients treated with afatinib in the first-line setting had significantly longer OS compared with those on gefitinib or erlotinib, while the PFS1 and PFS2 were longer for patients on afatinib but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: First-line afatinib, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with T790M mutation, demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to that using other EGFR-TKI in the first-line setting. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/315397 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.778 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kwok, Wang Chun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, James Chung Man | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tam, Terence Chi Chun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ip, Mary Sau Man | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, David Chi Leung | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-05T10:18:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-05T10:18:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Thoracic Cancer, 2022, v. 13, n. 14, p. 2057-2063 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1759-7706 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/315397 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are recommended as first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations. The sequential use of different EGFR-TKIs has been reported to demonstrate improvement in overall survival of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. There are limited reports on comparisons between regimens with first-line use of afatinib, gefitinib or erlotinib, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with acquired T790M mutation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who received first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib treatment, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with acquired T790M mutation, was conducted. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line EGFR-TKI (PFS1) and time to second objective disease progression (PFS2) were compared among patients on different first-line EGFR-TKIs. Results: Among 155 patients, 101 (65.2%), 38 (24.5%) and 16 (10.3%) patients were on first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, respectively. Patients treated with afatinib in the first-line setting had significantly longer OS compared with those on gefitinib or erlotinib, while the PFS1 and PFS2 were longer for patients on afatinib but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: First-line afatinib, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with T790M mutation, demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to that using other EGFR-TKI in the first-line setting. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Thoracic Cancer | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | afatinib | - |
dc.subject | erlotinib | - |
dc.subject | gefitinib | - |
dc.subject | osimertinib | - |
dc.subject | T790M | - |
dc.title | Survival benefits from afatinib compared with gefitinib and erlotinib among patients with common EGFR mutation in first-line setting | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1759-7714.14528 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35668712 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC9284183 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85131336552 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 14 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 2057 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 2063 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1759-7714 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000806587900001 | - |