File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: OSC9: Colour Stability and Matching Accuracy of Custom Dual Laminated Composite Resin Shade Guide

TitleOSC9: Colour Stability and Matching Accuracy of Custom Dual Laminated Composite Resin Shade Guide
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherMedknow.
Citation
11th Biennial Congress of Asian Academy of Prosthodontics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 21-23 September 2018. In Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2018, v. 18, n. suppl. 1, p. S10-S11 How to Cite?
AbstractAims: Custom-dual-laminated shade guides are used to mimic closely the material and layering technique used in final restoration. This study aims to determine optimal time duration for custom-dual-laminated composite resin shade guides to reach colour stability after polymerization and to compare their colour matching accuracy with the conventional shade guides. Materials and Methods: 18 incisor shaped dual-laminated resin composite specimens from two commercially available composite resin materials; Group 1 (Ceram. X® One Enamel & Dentine) and Group 2 (Filtek™ Z350 XT) were prepared into shade A2, A3 and A3.5 according to manufacturers’ instruction. Colour measurement done with spectrophotometer CIELab system immediately after polymerization (t0), 24 hours (t1), 7 days (t7), 14 days (t14) and 21 days (t21). The average values were obtained to calculate Δ between the specimens and Vitapan classical shade guide at each post-curing time. Data was analysed using repeated measure ANOVA (SPSS 24) and acceptability threshold (Δ ≤ 3.3) were used to determine matching accuracy. Results: Δ were significant for all specimens until 24 hours for Group 1 and 7 days for Group 2. At the optimal time period, all specimen showed Δ values greater than acceptability threshold (Δ ≤ 3.3) except for Group 2 A2 shade. Conclusions: Colour stability of custom shade guides were reached at 24 hours for Group 1 and 7 days for Group 2 after polymerization. Only Group 2 A2 shade was accurately matched relative to conventional shade guides emphasizing the importance of using custom dual laminated shade guide for multi-layering technique.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315475
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.386
PubMed Central ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKassim, MZ-
dc.contributor.authorRahimi, SN-
dc.contributor.authorBerhanuddin, MA-
dc.contributor.authorGhani, SMA-
dc.contributor.authorLim, TW-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-19T08:39:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-19T08:39:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citation11th Biennial Congress of Asian Academy of Prosthodontics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 21-23 September 2018. In Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2018, v. 18, n. suppl. 1, p. S10-S11-
dc.identifier.issn0972-4052-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315475-
dc.description.abstractAims: Custom-dual-laminated shade guides are used to mimic closely the material and layering technique used in final restoration. This study aims to determine optimal time duration for custom-dual-laminated composite resin shade guides to reach colour stability after polymerization and to compare their colour matching accuracy with the conventional shade guides. Materials and Methods: 18 incisor shaped dual-laminated resin composite specimens from two commercially available composite resin materials; Group 1 (Ceram. X® One Enamel & Dentine) and Group 2 (Filtek™ Z350 XT) were prepared into shade A2, A3 and A3.5 according to manufacturers’ instruction. Colour measurement done with spectrophotometer CIELab system immediately after polymerization (t0), 24 hours (t1), 7 days (t7), 14 days (t14) and 21 days (t21). The average values were obtained to calculate Δ between the specimens and Vitapan classical shade guide at each post-curing time. Data was analysed using repeated measure ANOVA (SPSS 24) and acceptability threshold (Δ ≤ 3.3) were used to determine matching accuracy. Results: Δ were significant for all specimens until 24 hours for Group 1 and 7 days for Group 2. At the optimal time period, all specimen showed Δ values greater than acceptability threshold (Δ ≤ 3.3) except for Group 2 A2 shade. Conclusions: Colour stability of custom shade guides were reached at 24 hours for Group 1 and 7 days for Group 2 after polymerization. Only Group 2 A2 shade was accurately matched relative to conventional shade guides emphasizing the importance of using custom dual laminated shade guide for multi-layering technique.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMedknow.-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Indian Prosthodontic Society-
dc.titleOSC9: Colour Stability and Matching Accuracy of Custom Dual Laminated Composite Resin Shade Guide-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/0972-4052.244598-
dc.identifier.pmid30532400-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6238442-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85126874392-
dc.identifier.volume18-
dc.identifier.issuesuppl. 1-
dc.identifier.spageS10-
dc.identifier.epageS11-
dc.publisher.placeKuala Lumpur, Malaysia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats