File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT: Part I. Prediction with a computer model

TitleAortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT: Part I. Prediction with a computer model
Authors
KeywordsComputed tomography (CT), computer programs, 761.12112, 981.12912
Computed tomography (CT), contrast enhancement, 761.12112, 981.12912
Computers, examination control
Contrast media, 761.12112, 981.12912
Model, mathematical
Issue Date1998
Citation
Radiology, 1998, v. 207, n. 3, p. 647-655 How to Cite?
AbstractPURPOSE: To develop a physiologic model of contrast medium enhancement by incorporating available physiologic data and contrast medium pharmacokinetics and to predict organ-specific contrast medium enhancement at computed tomography (CT) with various contrast medium injection protocols in patients of variable height and weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computer- based, compartmental model of the cardiovascular system was generated by using human physiologic parameters and more than 100 different equations to describe the transport of contrast medium. Blood volume, extracellular fluid volume, and regional blood flow were estimated from available data. Local structures were modeled mathematically to describe the distribution and dispersion of intravascularly administered iodinated contrast medium. A global model was formed by integrating regional circulation parameters with the models of local structures. Aortic and hepatic CT contrast-enhancement curves were simulated for three protocols and were compared with mean enhancement curves in three groups of 25-28 patients (80 patients total; 28 in one group, 25 in one group, and 27 in one group) receiving the same protocols. The percent difference in maximum enhancement between the simulated and empiric curves and the enhancement difference index (sum of the area difference between the simulated and empiric curves divided by the total area under the empiric curve) were computed. RESULTS: The simulated and empiric enhancement curves closely agreed in maximum enhancement (the mean percent difference in the aorta was 7.4%; liver, 4.89%) and in vanation over time (mean enhancement difference index in the aorta was 11.69%; liver, 12.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A computer-based, physiologic model that may help predict organ-specific CT contrast medium enhancement for different injection protocols was developed. Such a physiologic model may have many clinical applications.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315914
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 12.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.692
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBae, Kyongtae T.-
dc.contributor.authorHeiken, Jay P.-
dc.contributor.authorBrink, James A.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:48:35Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:48:35Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citationRadiology, 1998, v. 207, n. 3, p. 647-655-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315914-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To develop a physiologic model of contrast medium enhancement by incorporating available physiologic data and contrast medium pharmacokinetics and to predict organ-specific contrast medium enhancement at computed tomography (CT) with various contrast medium injection protocols in patients of variable height and weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computer- based, compartmental model of the cardiovascular system was generated by using human physiologic parameters and more than 100 different equations to describe the transport of contrast medium. Blood volume, extracellular fluid volume, and regional blood flow were estimated from available data. Local structures were modeled mathematically to describe the distribution and dispersion of intravascularly administered iodinated contrast medium. A global model was formed by integrating regional circulation parameters with the models of local structures. Aortic and hepatic CT contrast-enhancement curves were simulated for three protocols and were compared with mean enhancement curves in three groups of 25-28 patients (80 patients total; 28 in one group, 25 in one group, and 27 in one group) receiving the same protocols. The percent difference in maximum enhancement between the simulated and empiric curves and the enhancement difference index (sum of the area difference between the simulated and empiric curves divided by the total area under the empiric curve) were computed. RESULTS: The simulated and empiric enhancement curves closely agreed in maximum enhancement (the mean percent difference in the aorta was 7.4%; liver, 4.89%) and in vanation over time (mean enhancement difference index in the aorta was 11.69%; liver, 12.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A computer-based, physiologic model that may help predict organ-specific CT contrast medium enhancement for different injection protocols was developed. Such a physiologic model may have many clinical applications.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRadiology-
dc.subjectComputed tomography (CT), computer programs, 761.12112, 981.12912-
dc.subjectComputed tomography (CT), contrast enhancement, 761.12112, 981.12912-
dc.subjectComputers, examination control-
dc.subjectContrast media, 761.12112, 981.12912-
dc.subjectModel, mathematical-
dc.titleAortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT: Part I. Prediction with a computer model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiology.207.3.9609886-
dc.identifier.pmid9609886-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0031814686-
dc.identifier.volume207-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage647-
dc.identifier.epage655-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000073655500015-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats