File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.010
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-13244252474
- PMID: 15691726
- WOS: WOS:000226820100008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Computerized scheme for assessing ultrasonographic features of breast masses
Title | Computerized scheme for assessing ultrasonographic features of breast masses |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | breast mass breast ultrasonography Computer-aided diagnosis |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Citation | Academic Radiology, 2005, v. 12, n. 1, p. 58-66 How to Cite? |
Abstract | To evaluate the ultrasonographic features of breast masses using a computerized scheme and to correlate the feature values with radiologists' grading. One hundred and seventy-five breast ultrasound images (one to five images per subject) from 61 women (age 17-89 years, mean 43 years) were studied. Thirty-eight of the 157 images were from 11 women with malignant lesions, and the remaining 137 were from 50 patients with benign lesions. Two breast imaging radiologists participated in an observer performance study and were asked to grade, on a scale of 3, shape (1: regular, 3: very irregular), border (1: sharp, 3: ill-defined), internal texture (1: homogeneous, 3: very heterogeneous), width/depth ratio (1: flat, 3: tall), posterior enhancement (1: strong, 3: none), and lateral shadowing (1: strong, 3: none). The computerized scheme analyzed the breast region within a region of interest that was placed by a radiologist and quantified the following parameters: shape (jag count, disperse, convex hull depth, and lobulation count), border (acutance, average maximum ascending gradient, and sigmoid curve fitting), texture (edge density, co-occurrence matrix, and fractal dimension), width-depth ratio, posterior enhancement, and lateral shadowing. Correlations between the radiologists and the computerized scheme for assessing parameters in corresponding categories were computed. Good agreement was seen in posterior enhancement (P < .001, r = 0.45), lateral shadowing (P < .001, r = 0.38), width-depth ratio (P < .001, r = 0.33), and shape features (all P < .001): jag count (r = 0.38), disperseness (r = 0.55), and convex hull depth (r = 0.44). The remaining parameters demonstrated a poor or weak correlation (r < 0.30). The radiologists and the computerized scheme correlated best in analysis of shape features and posterior enhancement. We have yet to determine the significance of these features for the implementation of a computer-aided diagnosis program for characterizing breast ultrasound masses. © AUR, 2005. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/315945 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.062 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Kwang Gi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Seong Whi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Min, Seon Jung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jong Hyo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Min, Byoung Goo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Kyongtae T. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-24T15:48:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-24T15:48:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Academic Radiology, 2005, v. 12, n. 1, p. 58-66 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1076-6332 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/315945 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To evaluate the ultrasonographic features of breast masses using a computerized scheme and to correlate the feature values with radiologists' grading. One hundred and seventy-five breast ultrasound images (one to five images per subject) from 61 women (age 17-89 years, mean 43 years) were studied. Thirty-eight of the 157 images were from 11 women with malignant lesions, and the remaining 137 were from 50 patients with benign lesions. Two breast imaging radiologists participated in an observer performance study and were asked to grade, on a scale of 3, shape (1: regular, 3: very irregular), border (1: sharp, 3: ill-defined), internal texture (1: homogeneous, 3: very heterogeneous), width/depth ratio (1: flat, 3: tall), posterior enhancement (1: strong, 3: none), and lateral shadowing (1: strong, 3: none). The computerized scheme analyzed the breast region within a region of interest that was placed by a radiologist and quantified the following parameters: shape (jag count, disperse, convex hull depth, and lobulation count), border (acutance, average maximum ascending gradient, and sigmoid curve fitting), texture (edge density, co-occurrence matrix, and fractal dimension), width-depth ratio, posterior enhancement, and lateral shadowing. Correlations between the radiologists and the computerized scheme for assessing parameters in corresponding categories were computed. Good agreement was seen in posterior enhancement (P < .001, r = 0.45), lateral shadowing (P < .001, r = 0.38), width-depth ratio (P < .001, r = 0.33), and shape features (all P < .001): jag count (r = 0.38), disperseness (r = 0.55), and convex hull depth (r = 0.44). The remaining parameters demonstrated a poor or weak correlation (r < 0.30). The radiologists and the computerized scheme correlated best in analysis of shape features and posterior enhancement. We have yet to determine the significance of these features for the implementation of a computer-aided diagnosis program for characterizing breast ultrasound masses. © AUR, 2005. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Academic Radiology | - |
dc.subject | breast mass | - |
dc.subject | breast ultrasonography | - |
dc.subject | Computer-aided diagnosis | - |
dc.title | Computerized scheme for assessing ultrasonographic features of breast masses | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.010 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15691726 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-13244252474 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 58 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 66 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000226820100008 | - |