File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI: Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects

TitleRenal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI: Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects
Authors
KeywordsFlow validation
Kidney imaging
Phase velocity imaging
Quantitative flow
Renal blood flow
Issue Date2010
Citation
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010, v. 63, n. 4, p. 940-950 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study evaluates reliability of current technology for measurement of renal arterial blood flow by breath-held velocityencoded MRI. Overall accuracy was determined by comparing MRI measurements with known flow in controlled-flow-loop phantom studies. Measurements using prospective and retrospective gating methods were compared in phantom studies with pulsatile flow, not revealing significant differences. Phantom study results showed good accuracy, with deviations from true flow consistently below 13% for vessel diameters 3mm and above. Reproducibility in human subjects was evaluated by repeated studies in six healthy control subjects, comparing immediate repetition of the scan, repetition of the scan plane scouting, and week-to-week variation in repeated studies. The standard deviation in the 4-week protocol of repeated in vivo measurements of single-kidney renal flow in normal subjects was 59.7 mL/min, corresponding with an average coefficient of variation of 10.55%. Comparison of renal arterial blood flow reproducibility with and without gadolinium contrast showed no significant differences in mean or standard deviation. A breakdown among error components showed corresponding marginal standard deviations (coefficients of variation) 23.8 mL/min (4.21%) for immediate repetition of the breath-held flow scan, 39.13 mL/min (6.90%) for repeated plane scouting, and 40.76 mL/min (7.20%) for weekly fluctuations in renal blood flow. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316034
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.343
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDambreville, Samuel-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Arlene B.-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Vicente E.-
dc.contributor.authorKing, Bernard F.-
dc.contributor.authorWallin, Ashley K.-
dc.contributor.authorFrakes, David H.-
dc.contributor.authorYoganathan, Ajit P.-
dc.contributor.authorWijayawardana, Sameera R.-
dc.contributor.authorEasley, Kirk-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Kyongtae T.-
dc.contributor.authorBrummer, Marijn E.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:49:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:49:01Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010, v. 63, n. 4, p. 940-950-
dc.identifier.issn0740-3194-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316034-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates reliability of current technology for measurement of renal arterial blood flow by breath-held velocityencoded MRI. Overall accuracy was determined by comparing MRI measurements with known flow in controlled-flow-loop phantom studies. Measurements using prospective and retrospective gating methods were compared in phantom studies with pulsatile flow, not revealing significant differences. Phantom study results showed good accuracy, with deviations from true flow consistently below 13% for vessel diameters 3mm and above. Reproducibility in human subjects was evaluated by repeated studies in six healthy control subjects, comparing immediate repetition of the scan, repetition of the scan plane scouting, and week-to-week variation in repeated studies. The standard deviation in the 4-week protocol of repeated in vivo measurements of single-kidney renal flow in normal subjects was 59.7 mL/min, corresponding with an average coefficient of variation of 10.55%. Comparison of renal arterial blood flow reproducibility with and without gadolinium contrast showed no significant differences in mean or standard deviation. A breakdown among error components showed corresponding marginal standard deviations (coefficients of variation) 23.8 mL/min (4.21%) for immediate repetition of the breath-held flow scan, 39.13 mL/min (6.90%) for repeated plane scouting, and 40.76 mL/min (7.20%) for weekly fluctuations in renal blood flow. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMagnetic Resonance in Medicine-
dc.subjectFlow validation-
dc.subjectKidney imaging-
dc.subjectPhase velocity imaging-
dc.subjectQuantitative flow-
dc.subjectRenal blood flow-
dc.titleRenal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI: Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mrm.22278-
dc.identifier.pmid20373395-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77950606467-
dc.identifier.volume63-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage940-
dc.identifier.epage950-
dc.identifier.eissn1522-2594-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000276064300011-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats