File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1148/radiol.11101459
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79959559275
- PMID: 21406629
- WOS: WOS:000291932300016
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: CT of the pancreas: Comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images
Title | CT of the pancreas: Comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Citation | Radiology, 2011, v. 260, n. 1, p. 139-147 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To prospectively compare 320-detector volumetric and 64-detector helical computed tomographic (CT) images of the pancreas for depiction of anatomic structures, image noise, and radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. A total of 154 patients (85 men, 69 women; age range, 26-85 years; mean age, 67 years) who underwent biphasic (arterial and pancreatic phase) contrast material - enhanced CT performed with a 320-detector scanner were randomized into two groups: the 320-detector group and the 64-detector group. Biphasic transaxial multiplanar reformatted images and volume-rendered CT angiograms were obtained. CT numbers in the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat tissue; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and dose-length product (DLP) were compared. In addition, image quality and focal lesion depiction(n = 35) were qualitatively determined in the two groups. Unpaired t and Mann-Whitney tests were used for quantitative and qualitative assessment, respectively. Results: No significant difference in CT numbers of the abdominal aorta and pancreas was noted between the two groups. Mean DLP was 43% lower in the 320-detector group (675.4 mGy•cm) than in the 64-detector group (1187.8 mGy•cm) (P < .001). SNR of the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat on biphasic images was significantly lower in the 320-detector group than in the 64-detector group (P < .001). Image quality was acceptable in both groups and was slightly better in the 64-detector group for pancreatic phase axial images (P = .02) and arterial phase multiplanar reformatted images (P < .01). No significant difference was found in the depiction of pancreatic parenchyma, main pancreatic duct, focal pancreatic lesions, splanchnic arteries, or most of the small splanchnic arterial branches. Conclusion: A 320-detector CT scan facilitates fast volumetric contrast-enhanced CT of the entire pancreas with acceptable image quality, even though SNR was significantly lower at 320-detector volumetric scanning. © RSNA, 2011. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/316052 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 12.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.692 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Goshima, Satoshi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kanematsu, Masayuki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nishibori, Hironori | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sakurai, Kota | - |
dc.contributor.author | Miyazawa, Daisuke | - |
dc.contributor.author | Watanabe, Haruo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kondo, Hiroshi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shiratori, Yoshimune | - |
dc.contributor.author | Onozuka, Minoru | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moriyama, Noriyuki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Kyongtae T. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-24T15:49:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-24T15:49:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Radiology, 2011, v. 260, n. 1, p. 139-147 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-8419 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/316052 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To prospectively compare 320-detector volumetric and 64-detector helical computed tomographic (CT) images of the pancreas for depiction of anatomic structures, image noise, and radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. A total of 154 patients (85 men, 69 women; age range, 26-85 years; mean age, 67 years) who underwent biphasic (arterial and pancreatic phase) contrast material - enhanced CT performed with a 320-detector scanner were randomized into two groups: the 320-detector group and the 64-detector group. Biphasic transaxial multiplanar reformatted images and volume-rendered CT angiograms were obtained. CT numbers in the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat tissue; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and dose-length product (DLP) were compared. In addition, image quality and focal lesion depiction(n = 35) were qualitatively determined in the two groups. Unpaired t and Mann-Whitney tests were used for quantitative and qualitative assessment, respectively. Results: No significant difference in CT numbers of the abdominal aorta and pancreas was noted between the two groups. Mean DLP was 43% lower in the 320-detector group (675.4 mGy•cm) than in the 64-detector group (1187.8 mGy•cm) (P < .001). SNR of the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat on biphasic images was significantly lower in the 320-detector group than in the 64-detector group (P < .001). Image quality was acceptable in both groups and was slightly better in the 64-detector group for pancreatic phase axial images (P = .02) and arterial phase multiplanar reformatted images (P < .01). No significant difference was found in the depiction of pancreatic parenchyma, main pancreatic duct, focal pancreatic lesions, splanchnic arteries, or most of the small splanchnic arterial branches. Conclusion: A 320-detector CT scan facilitates fast volumetric contrast-enhanced CT of the entire pancreas with acceptable image quality, even though SNR was significantly lower at 320-detector volumetric scanning. © RSNA, 2011. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Radiology | - |
dc.title | CT of the pancreas: Comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1148/radiol.11101459 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21406629 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79959559275 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 260 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 139 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 147 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1527-1315 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000291932300016 | - |