File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.019
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84927567618
- PMID: 25740700
- WOS: WOS:000352705200022
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Whole-body CT with high heat-capacity X-ray tube and automated tube current modulation - Effect of tube current limitation on contrast enhancement, image quality and radiation dose
Title | Whole-body CT with high heat-capacity X-ray tube and automated tube current modulation - Effect of tube current limitation on contrast enhancement, image quality and radiation dose |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | CT Image quality Radiation exposure Tube current limitation Whole body |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | European Journal of Radiology, 2015, v. 84, n. 5, p. 877-883 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose To evaluate the effect of tube current limitation on contrast enhancement, image quality, and radiation dose in whole-body 64-detector CT with a high heat-capacity X-ray tube and automated tube current modulation. Materials and methods One hundred eighteen patients were randomized into three whole-body CT protocols: tube current limitation at 210 mA, 450 mA, and no limitation. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), dose-length product (DLP), estimated effective dose (ED), and image quality were assessed. Results Mean SNR of aorta was comparable among protocols, but that of liver was somewhat lower in 210-mA than in 450-mA and no-limitation protocols (p < 0.05). Mean DLP with 210-mA (533.8 mGy cm) was reduced by 31% from that with 450-mA (768.4 mGy cm) and by 38% from that with no-limitation protocol (861.3 mGy cm), respectively. Image quality was slightly degraded (p < 0.017) with 210 mA relative to the others in thorax and pelvis, but no difference was found in diagnostic acceptability. Conclusion For whole-body CT using multidetector CT mounted with a high heat-capacity X-ray tube, an appropriate tube current limitation setting may help reduce excessive radiation dose without significant compromise in diagnostic acceptability. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/316102 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.976 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kanematsu, Masayuki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kondo, Hiroshi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Miyoshi, Toshiharu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Goshima, Satoshi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Noda, Yoshifumi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tanahashi, Yukichi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Kyongtae T. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-24T15:49:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-24T15:49:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Journal of Radiology, 2015, v. 84, n. 5, p. 877-883 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0720-048X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/316102 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose To evaluate the effect of tube current limitation on contrast enhancement, image quality, and radiation dose in whole-body 64-detector CT with a high heat-capacity X-ray tube and automated tube current modulation. Materials and methods One hundred eighteen patients were randomized into three whole-body CT protocols: tube current limitation at 210 mA, 450 mA, and no limitation. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), dose-length product (DLP), estimated effective dose (ED), and image quality were assessed. Results Mean SNR of aorta was comparable among protocols, but that of liver was somewhat lower in 210-mA than in 450-mA and no-limitation protocols (p < 0.05). Mean DLP with 210-mA (533.8 mGy cm) was reduced by 31% from that with 450-mA (768.4 mGy cm) and by 38% from that with no-limitation protocol (861.3 mGy cm), respectively. Image quality was slightly degraded (p < 0.017) with 210 mA relative to the others in thorax and pelvis, but no difference was found in diagnostic acceptability. Conclusion For whole-body CT using multidetector CT mounted with a high heat-capacity X-ray tube, an appropriate tube current limitation setting may help reduce excessive radiation dose without significant compromise in diagnostic acceptability. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Radiology | - |
dc.subject | CT | - |
dc.subject | Image quality | - |
dc.subject | Radiation exposure | - |
dc.subject | Tube current limitation | - |
dc.subject | Whole body | - |
dc.title | Whole-body CT with high heat-capacity X-ray tube and automated tube current modulation - Effect of tube current limitation on contrast enhancement, image quality and radiation dose | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.019 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25740700 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84927567618 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 84 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 877 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 883 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-7727 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000352705200022 | - |