File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Assessment of five global satellite products of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: Intercomparison and direct validation against ground-based data

TitleAssessment of five global satellite products of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: Intercomparison and direct validation against ground-based data
Authors
KeywordsDirect validation
Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation
GEOV1
Intercomparison
MERIS
MISR
MODIS
SeaWiFS
Issue Date2015
Citation
Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, v. 163, p. 270-285 How to Cite?
AbstractThe fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) is a critical input parameter in many climate and ecological models. The accuracy of satellite FAPAR products directly influences estimates of ecosystem productivity and carbon stocks. The targeted accuracy of FAPAR products is 10%, or 0.05, for many applications. It is important to evaluate satellite FAPAR products and understand differences between the products to effectively use them in carbon cycling models. In this study, five global FAPAR products, namely MODIS, MISR, MERIS, SeaWiFS, and GEOV1 are intercompared over different land covers and directly validated with ground-based measurements at VAlidation of Land European Remote sensing Instruments (VALERI) and AmeriFlux sites. Intercomparison results show that MODIS, MISR, and GEOV1 agree well with each other and so do MERIS and SeaWiFS, but the difference between these two groups can be as large as 0.1. The temporal trends of these products agree better with each other in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere. The trends in the Northern Hemisphere are similar to those globally. However, the conclusions from the northern hemispheric scale could not be extended to the global scale for land covers such as savannahs and broadleaf evergreen forests. The differences between the products are consistent throughout the year over most of the land cover types, except over the forests, because of the different assumptions in the retrieval algorithms and the differences between green and total FAPAR products over forests. Direct validation results show that MERIS, MODIS, MISR, and GEOV1 FAPAR products have an uncertainty of 0.14 when validating with total FAPAR measurements, and 0.09 when validating with green FAPAR measurements. Overall, current FAPAR products are close to, but have not fulfilled, the accuracy requirement, and further improvements are still needed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321638
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 13.850
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.611
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTao, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Shunlin-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Dongdong-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:20:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:20:25Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing of Environment, 2015, v. 163, p. 270-285-
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321638-
dc.description.abstractThe fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) is a critical input parameter in many climate and ecological models. The accuracy of satellite FAPAR products directly influences estimates of ecosystem productivity and carbon stocks. The targeted accuracy of FAPAR products is 10%, or 0.05, for many applications. It is important to evaluate satellite FAPAR products and understand differences between the products to effectively use them in carbon cycling models. In this study, five global FAPAR products, namely MODIS, MISR, MERIS, SeaWiFS, and GEOV1 are intercompared over different land covers and directly validated with ground-based measurements at VAlidation of Land European Remote sensing Instruments (VALERI) and AmeriFlux sites. Intercomparison results show that MODIS, MISR, and GEOV1 agree well with each other and so do MERIS and SeaWiFS, but the difference between these two groups can be as large as 0.1. The temporal trends of these products agree better with each other in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere. The trends in the Northern Hemisphere are similar to those globally. However, the conclusions from the northern hemispheric scale could not be extended to the global scale for land covers such as savannahs and broadleaf evergreen forests. The differences between the products are consistent throughout the year over most of the land cover types, except over the forests, because of the different assumptions in the retrieval algorithms and the differences between green and total FAPAR products over forests. Direct validation results show that MERIS, MODIS, MISR, and GEOV1 FAPAR products have an uncertainty of 0.14 when validating with total FAPAR measurements, and 0.09 when validating with green FAPAR measurements. Overall, current FAPAR products are close to, but have not fulfilled, the accuracy requirement, and further improvements are still needed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing of Environment-
dc.subjectDirect validation-
dc.subjectFraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation-
dc.subjectGEOV1-
dc.subjectIntercomparison-
dc.subjectMERIS-
dc.subjectMISR-
dc.subjectMODIS-
dc.subjectSeaWiFS-
dc.titleAssessment of five global satellite products of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: Intercomparison and direct validation against ground-based data-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.025-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84937765251-
dc.identifier.volume163-
dc.identifier.spage270-
dc.identifier.epage285-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000355771300024-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats