File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Surface shortwave net radiation estimation from landsat TM/ETM+ data using four machine learning algorithms

TitleSurface shortwave net radiation estimation from landsat TM/ETM+ data using four machine learning algorithms
Authors
KeywordsEnhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+)
Landsat
Machine learning model
Remote sensing
Surface shortwave net radiation
Thematic Mapper (TM)
Issue Date2019
Citation
Remote Sensing, 2019, v. 11, n. 23, article no. 2847 How to Cite?
AbstractSurface shortwave net radiation (SSNR) flux is essential for the determination of the radiation energy balance between the atmosphere and the Earth's surface. The satellite-derived intermediate SSNR data are strongly needed to bridge the gap between existing coarse-resolution SSNR products and point-based measurements. In this study, four different machine learning (ML) algorithms were tested to estimate the SSNR from the Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM)/ Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance and other ancillary information (i.e., clearness index, water vapor) at instantaneous and daily scales under all sky conditions. The four ML algorithms include the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), backpropagation neural network (BPNN), support vector regression (SVR), and gradient boosting regression tree (GBRT). Collected in-situ measurements were used to train the global model (using all data) and the conditional models (in which all data were divided into subsets and the models were fitted separately). The validation results indicated that the GBRT-based global model (GGM) performs the best at both the instantaneous and daily scales. For example, the GGM based on the TM data yielded a coefficient of determination value (R2 ) of 0.88 and 0.94, an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 73.23 W·m-2 (15.09%) and 18.76 W·m-2 (11.2%), and a bias of 0.64 W·m-2 and -1.74W·m-2 for instantaneous and daily SSNR, respectively. Compared to the Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) daily SSNR product, the daily TM-SSNR showed a very similar spatial distribution but with more details. Further analysis also demonstrated the robustness of the GGM for various land cover types, elevation, general atmospheric conditions, and seasons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321865
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yezhe-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Bo-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Shunlin-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Dongdong-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Tao-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qian-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Xiang-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jianglei-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:21:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:21:58Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, 2019, v. 11, n. 23, article no. 2847-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321865-
dc.description.abstractSurface shortwave net radiation (SSNR) flux is essential for the determination of the radiation energy balance between the atmosphere and the Earth's surface. The satellite-derived intermediate SSNR data are strongly needed to bridge the gap between existing coarse-resolution SSNR products and point-based measurements. In this study, four different machine learning (ML) algorithms were tested to estimate the SSNR from the Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM)/ Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance and other ancillary information (i.e., clearness index, water vapor) at instantaneous and daily scales under all sky conditions. The four ML algorithms include the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), backpropagation neural network (BPNN), support vector regression (SVR), and gradient boosting regression tree (GBRT). Collected in-situ measurements were used to train the global model (using all data) and the conditional models (in which all data were divided into subsets and the models were fitted separately). The validation results indicated that the GBRT-based global model (GGM) performs the best at both the instantaneous and daily scales. For example, the GGM based on the TM data yielded a coefficient of determination value (R2 ) of 0.88 and 0.94, an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 73.23 W·m-2 (15.09%) and 18.76 W·m-2 (11.2%), and a bias of 0.64 W·m-2 and -1.74W·m-2 for instantaneous and daily SSNR, respectively. Compared to the Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) daily SSNR product, the daily TM-SSNR showed a very similar spatial distribution but with more details. Further analysis also demonstrated the robustness of the GGM for various land cover types, elevation, general atmospheric conditions, and seasons.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectEnhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+)-
dc.subjectLandsat-
dc.subjectMachine learning model-
dc.subjectRemote sensing-
dc.subjectSurface shortwave net radiation-
dc.subjectThematic Mapper (TM)-
dc.titleSurface shortwave net radiation estimation from landsat TM/ETM+ data using four machine learning algorithms-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs11232847-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85076526192-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue23-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 2847-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 2847-
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000508382100128-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats