File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Accuracy assessment of the MODIS 16-day albedo product for snow: Comparisons with Greenland in situ measurements

TitleAccuracy assessment of the MODIS 16-day albedo product for snow: Comparisons with Greenland in situ measurements
Authors
KeywordsGreenland
MODIS
Snow
Issue Date2005
Citation
Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, v. 94, n. 1, p. 46-60 How to Cite?
AbstractThe accuracy of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 16-day albedo product (MOD43) is assessed using ground-based albedo observations from automatic weather stations (AWS) over spatially homogeneous snow and semihomogeneous ice-covered surfaces on the Greenland ice sheet. Data from 16 AWS locations, spanning the years 2000-2003, were used for this assessment. In situ reflected shortwave data were corrected for a systematic positive spectral sensitivity bias of between 0.01 and 0.09 on a site-by-site basis using precise optical black radiometer data. Results indicate that the MOD43 albedo product retrieves snow albedo with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of ±0.07 as compared to the station measurements, which have ±0.035 RMSE uncertainty. If we eliminate all satellite retrievals that rely on the backup algorithm and consider only the highest quality results from the primary bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) algorithm, the MODIS albedo RMSE is ±0.04, slightly larger than the in situ measurement uncertainty. There is general agreement between MODIS and in situ observations for albedo <0.7, while near the upper limit, a -0.05 MODIS albedo bias is evident from the scatter of the 16-site composite. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/322014
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.310
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStroeve, Julienne-
dc.contributor.authorBox, Jason E.-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Shunlin-
dc.contributor.authorNolin, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorSchaaf, Crystal-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:23:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:23:01Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing of Environment, 2005, v. 94, n. 1, p. 46-60-
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/322014-
dc.description.abstractThe accuracy of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 16-day albedo product (MOD43) is assessed using ground-based albedo observations from automatic weather stations (AWS) over spatially homogeneous snow and semihomogeneous ice-covered surfaces on the Greenland ice sheet. Data from 16 AWS locations, spanning the years 2000-2003, were used for this assessment. In situ reflected shortwave data were corrected for a systematic positive spectral sensitivity bias of between 0.01 and 0.09 on a site-by-site basis using precise optical black radiometer data. Results indicate that the MOD43 albedo product retrieves snow albedo with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of ±0.07 as compared to the station measurements, which have ±0.035 RMSE uncertainty. If we eliminate all satellite retrievals that rely on the backup algorithm and consider only the highest quality results from the primary bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) algorithm, the MODIS albedo RMSE is ±0.04, slightly larger than the in situ measurement uncertainty. There is general agreement between MODIS and in situ observations for albedo <0.7, while near the upper limit, a -0.05 MODIS albedo bias is evident from the scatter of the 16-site composite. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing of Environment-
dc.subjectGreenland-
dc.subjectMODIS-
dc.subjectSnow-
dc.titleAccuracy assessment of the MODIS 16-day albedo product for snow: Comparisons with Greenland in situ measurements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2004.09.001-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-8844281951-
dc.identifier.volume94-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage46-
dc.identifier.epage60-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000226270500005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats