File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Characterization and intercomparison of global moderate resolution leaf area index (LAI) products: Analysis of climatologies and theoretical uncertainties

TitleCharacterization and intercomparison of global moderate resolution leaf area index (LAI) products: Analysis of climatologies and theoretical uncertainties
Authors
Keywordsclimatology
intercomparison
leaf area index (LAI)
MODIS
relative uncertainty
theoretical uncertainty
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2013, v. 118, n. 2, p. 529-548 How to Cite?
AbstractLeaf area index (LAI) is a critical variable for land surface and climate modeling studies. Several global LAI products exist, and it is important to know how these products perform and what their uncertainties are. Five major global LAI products - MODIS, GEOV1, GLASS, GLOBMAP, and JRC-TIP - were compared between 2003 and 2010 at a 0.01° spatial resolution and with a monthly time step. The daily Land-SAF product was used as a regional reference in order to evaluate the performance of other global products in Africa. Cross-sensor LAI conversion equations were derived for different biome types. Product uncertainties were assessed by looking into the product quantitative quality indicators (QQIs) attached to MODIS, GEOV1, and JRC-TIP. MODIS, GEOV1, GLASS, and GLOBMAP are generally consistent and show strong linear relationships between the products (R2 > 0.74), with typical deviations of < 0.5 for nonforest and < 1.0 for forest biomes. JRC-TIP, the only effective LAI product, is about half the values of the other LAI products. The average uncertainties and relative uncertainties are in the following order: MODIS (0.17, 11.5%) < GEOV1 (0.24, 26.6%) < Land-SAF (0.36, 37.8%) < JRC-TIP (0.43, 114.3%). The highest relative uncertainties usually appear in ecological transition zones. More than 75% of MODIS, GEOV1, JRC-TIP, and Land-SAF pixels are within the absolute uncertainty requirements (± 0.5) set by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS), whereas more than 78.5% of MODIS and 44.6% of GEOV1 pixels are within the threshold for relative uncertainty (20%). This study reveals the discrepancies mainly due to differences between definitions, retrieval algorithms, and input data. Future product development and validation studies should focus on areas (e.g., sparsely vegetated and savanna areas) and periods (e.g., winter time) with higher uncertainties. © 2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/322030

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFang, Hongliang-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Chongya-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Wenjuan-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Shanshan-
dc.contributor.authorBaret, Frédéric-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jing M.-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Haro, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Shunlin-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ronggao-
dc.contributor.authorMyneni, Ranga B.-
dc.contributor.authorPinty, Bernard-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Zhiqiang-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Zaichun-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:23:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:23:07Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2013, v. 118, n. 2, p. 529-548-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/322030-
dc.description.abstractLeaf area index (LAI) is a critical variable for land surface and climate modeling studies. Several global LAI products exist, and it is important to know how these products perform and what their uncertainties are. Five major global LAI products - MODIS, GEOV1, GLASS, GLOBMAP, and JRC-TIP - were compared between 2003 and 2010 at a 0.01° spatial resolution and with a monthly time step. The daily Land-SAF product was used as a regional reference in order to evaluate the performance of other global products in Africa. Cross-sensor LAI conversion equations were derived for different biome types. Product uncertainties were assessed by looking into the product quantitative quality indicators (QQIs) attached to MODIS, GEOV1, and JRC-TIP. MODIS, GEOV1, GLASS, and GLOBMAP are generally consistent and show strong linear relationships between the products (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.74), with typical deviations of < 0.5 for nonforest and < 1.0 for forest biomes. JRC-TIP, the only effective LAI product, is about half the values of the other LAI products. The average uncertainties and relative uncertainties are in the following order: MODIS (0.17, 11.5%) < GEOV1 (0.24, 26.6%) < Land-SAF (0.36, 37.8%) < JRC-TIP (0.43, 114.3%). The highest relative uncertainties usually appear in ecological transition zones. More than 75% of MODIS, GEOV1, JRC-TIP, and Land-SAF pixels are within the absolute uncertainty requirements (± 0.5) set by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS), whereas more than 78.5% of MODIS and 44.6% of GEOV1 pixels are within the threshold for relative uncertainty (20%). This study reveals the discrepancies mainly due to differences between definitions, retrieval algorithms, and input data. Future product development and validation studies should focus on areas (e.g., sparsely vegetated and savanna areas) and periods (e.g., winter time) with higher uncertainties. © 2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences-
dc.subjectclimatology-
dc.subjectintercomparison-
dc.subjectleaf area index (LAI)-
dc.subjectMODIS-
dc.subjectrelative uncertainty-
dc.subjecttheoretical uncertainty-
dc.titleCharacterization and intercomparison of global moderate resolution leaf area index (LAI) products: Analysis of climatologies and theoretical uncertainties-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jgrg.20051-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84880123662-
dc.identifier.volume118-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage529-
dc.identifier.epage548-
dc.identifier.eissn2169-8961-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats