File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/jcpe.13183
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85073578061
- PMID: 31446644
- WOS: WOS:000485448800001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study
Title | Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | artifacts cone-beam computed tomography cortical bone dental implants imaging |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2019, v. 46, n. 11, p. 1134-1143 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Aim: The aim of this article was to evaluate the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurements around implants on CBCT. Material and methods: Forty-four Osseospeed EV implants (3.6 in Ø) were placed guided and flapless in five fresh frozen human cadaver heads. The buccal peri-implant bone was measured clinically via guided bone sounding. Post-op CBCTs were taken with two different CBCT scanners (NewTom® and Accuitomo®) on which the buccal bone was measured. Consequently, after implant removal, a new CBCT was made without implant artefacts (image reference standard) on which the real buccal bone thickness was scored. Results: Due to an average blooming (artificial increase of implant diameter) percentage of 12%–15%, the buccal peri-implant bone thickness was underestimated by 0.3 mm on both CBCT devices. Immediately adjacent to the implant blooming area, a doubtful zone of about 0.45 mm was observed in which the buccal bone was not always visible. Buccal bone that was thick enough to fall outside this doubtful zone could always be visualized. Conclusion: The findings in this study may help the clinician in the decision-making process whether or not to intervene surgically in areas with ambiguous CBCT results. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/323490 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Vanderstuyft, Tony | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tarce, Mihai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sanaan, Bahoz | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jacobs, Reinhilde | - |
dc.contributor.author | de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla | - |
dc.contributor.author | Quirynen, Marc | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-06T14:10:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-06T14:10:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2019, v. 46, n. 11, p. 1134-1143 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0303-6979 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/323490 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: The aim of this article was to evaluate the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurements around implants on CBCT. Material and methods: Forty-four Osseospeed EV implants (3.6 in Ø) were placed guided and flapless in five fresh frozen human cadaver heads. The buccal peri-implant bone was measured clinically via guided bone sounding. Post-op CBCTs were taken with two different CBCT scanners (NewTom® and Accuitomo®) on which the buccal bone was measured. Consequently, after implant removal, a new CBCT was made without implant artefacts (image reference standard) on which the real buccal bone thickness was scored. Results: Due to an average blooming (artificial increase of implant diameter) percentage of 12%–15%, the buccal peri-implant bone thickness was underestimated by 0.3 mm on both CBCT devices. Immediately adjacent to the implant blooming area, a doubtful zone of about 0.45 mm was observed in which the buccal bone was not always visible. Buccal bone that was thick enough to fall outside this doubtful zone could always be visualized. Conclusion: The findings in this study may help the clinician in the decision-making process whether or not to intervene surgically in areas with ambiguous CBCT results. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Periodontology | - |
dc.subject | artifacts | - |
dc.subject | cone-beam computed tomography | - |
dc.subject | cortical bone | - |
dc.subject | dental implants | - |
dc.subject | imaging | - |
dc.title | Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jcpe.13183 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31446644 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85073578061 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 46 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1134 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1143 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1600-051X | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000485448800001 | - |