File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Immigrant perceptions of discrimination in health care: The California health interview survey 2003

TitleImmigrant perceptions of discrimination in health care: The California health interview survey 2003
Authors
KeywordsDiscrimination
Health disparities
Immigrants
Issue Date2006
Citation
Medical Care, 2006, v. 44, n. 10, p. 914-920 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: U.S. healthcare disparities may be in part the result of differential experiences of discrimination in health care. Previous research about discrimination has focused on race/ethnicity. Because immigrants are clustered in certain racial and ethnic groups, failure to consider immigration status could distort race/ethnicity effects. Objectives: We examined whether foreign-born persons are more likely to report discrimination in healthcare than U.S.-born persons in the same race/ethnic group, whether the immigration effect varies by race/ethnicity, and whether the immigration effect is "explained" by sociodemographic factors. Research Design: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2003 California Health Interview Survey consisting of 42,044 adult respondents. Logistic regression models use replicate weights to adjust for nonresponse and complex survey design. Outcome Measure: The outcome measure of this study was respondent reports that there was a time when they would have gotten better medical care if they had belonged to a different race or ethnic group. Results: Seven percent of blacks and Latinos and 4% of Asians reported healthcare discrimination within the past 5 years. Immigrants were more likely to report discrimination than U.S.-born persons adjusting for race/ethnicity. For Asians, only the foreign-born were more likely than whites to report discrimination. For Latinos, increased perceptions of discrimination were attributable to sociodemographic factors for the U.S.-born but not for the foreign-born. Speaking a language other than English at home increased discrimination reports regardless of birthplace; private insurance was protective for the U.S.-born only. Conclusions: Immigration status should be included in studies of healthcare disparities because nativity is a key determinant of discrimination experiences for Asians and Latinos. Copyright © 2006 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/323794
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.384
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLauderdale, Diane S.-
dc.contributor.authorWen, Ming-
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Elizabeth A.-
dc.contributor.authorKandula, Namratha R.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T02:59:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-13T02:59:23Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Care, 2006, v. 44, n. 10, p. 914-920-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7079-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/323794-
dc.description.abstractBackground: U.S. healthcare disparities may be in part the result of differential experiences of discrimination in health care. Previous research about discrimination has focused on race/ethnicity. Because immigrants are clustered in certain racial and ethnic groups, failure to consider immigration status could distort race/ethnicity effects. Objectives: We examined whether foreign-born persons are more likely to report discrimination in healthcare than U.S.-born persons in the same race/ethnic group, whether the immigration effect varies by race/ethnicity, and whether the immigration effect is "explained" by sociodemographic factors. Research Design: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2003 California Health Interview Survey consisting of 42,044 adult respondents. Logistic regression models use replicate weights to adjust for nonresponse and complex survey design. Outcome Measure: The outcome measure of this study was respondent reports that there was a time when they would have gotten better medical care if they had belonged to a different race or ethnic group. Results: Seven percent of blacks and Latinos and 4% of Asians reported healthcare discrimination within the past 5 years. Immigrants were more likely to report discrimination than U.S.-born persons adjusting for race/ethnicity. For Asians, only the foreign-born were more likely than whites to report discrimination. For Latinos, increased perceptions of discrimination were attributable to sociodemographic factors for the U.S.-born but not for the foreign-born. Speaking a language other than English at home increased discrimination reports regardless of birthplace; private insurance was protective for the U.S.-born only. Conclusions: Immigration status should be included in studies of healthcare disparities because nativity is a key determinant of discrimination experiences for Asians and Latinos. Copyright © 2006 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Care-
dc.subjectDiscrimination-
dc.subjectHealth disparities-
dc.subjectImmigrants-
dc.titleImmigrant perceptions of discrimination in health care: The California health interview survey 2003-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.mlr.0000220829.87073.f7-
dc.identifier.pmid17001262-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33749036559-
dc.identifier.volume44-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage914-
dc.identifier.epage920-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000241115500005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats