File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S

TitleBuilt environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S
Authors
KeywordsActive commuting
Active transportation
Built environment
Census tracts
Rural
Urban
Issue Date2017
Citation
SSM - Population Health, 2017, v. 3, p. 435-441 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of this research was to investigate rural-urban differences in participation rates in three modes of active commuting (AC) and their built environmental correlates. The 2010 Census supplemented with other datasets were used to analyze AC rates in percent of workers age 16+ walking, biking, or taking public transportation to work in 70,172 Census tracts, including 12,844 rural and 57,328 urban. Random-intercept factional logit regressions were used to account for zero-inflated data and for clustering of tracts within counties. We found that the average AC rates were 3.44% rural and 2.77% urban (p<0.01) for walking to work, 0.40% rural and 0.58% urban (p<0.01) for biking to work, and 0.59% rural and 5.86% urban (p<0.01) for public transportation to work. Some environmental variables had similar relationships with AC in rural and urban tracts, such as a negative association between tract greenness and prevalence of walking to work. Others had opposite correlational directions for rural vs. urban, such as street connectivity for walking to work and population density for both walking to work and public transportation to work. We concluded that rurality is an important moderator in AC-environment relationships. In developing strategies to promote AC, attention needs to be paid to rural-urban differences to avoid unintended consequences.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324014
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFan, Jessie X.-
dc.contributor.authorWen, Ming-
dc.contributor.authorWan, Neng-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T03:00:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-13T03:00:54Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationSSM - Population Health, 2017, v. 3, p. 435-441-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324014-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research was to investigate rural-urban differences in participation rates in three modes of active commuting (AC) and their built environmental correlates. The 2010 Census supplemented with other datasets were used to analyze AC rates in percent of workers age 16+ walking, biking, or taking public transportation to work in 70,172 Census tracts, including 12,844 rural and 57,328 urban. Random-intercept factional logit regressions were used to account for zero-inflated data and for clustering of tracts within counties. We found that the average AC rates were 3.44% rural and 2.77% urban (p<0.01) for walking to work, 0.40% rural and 0.58% urban (p<0.01) for biking to work, and 0.59% rural and 5.86% urban (p<0.01) for public transportation to work. Some environmental variables had similar relationships with AC in rural and urban tracts, such as a negative association between tract greenness and prevalence of walking to work. Others had opposite correlational directions for rural vs. urban, such as street connectivity for walking to work and population density for both walking to work and public transportation to work. We concluded that rurality is an important moderator in AC-environment relationships. In developing strategies to promote AC, attention needs to be paid to rural-urban differences to avoid unintended consequences.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSSM - Population Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectActive commuting-
dc.subjectActive transportation-
dc.subjectBuilt environment-
dc.subjectCensus tracts-
dc.subjectRural-
dc.subjectUrban-
dc.titleBuilt environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007-
dc.identifier.pmid29124104-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC5673263-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85019405467-
dc.identifier.volume3-
dc.identifier.spage435-
dc.identifier.epage441-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-8273-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000448680700048-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats