File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147876
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85106554966
- PMID: 34051508
- WOS: WOS:000677549900014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States
Title | Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Ambient temperature Covid-19 transmission Effective reproduction number Implementation of physical distancing interventions Interaction effects |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Citation | Science of the Total Environment, 2021, v. 789, article no. 147876 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Governments may relax physical distancing interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) containment in warm seasons/areas to prevent economic contractions. However, it is not clear whether higher temperature may offset the transmission risk posed by this relaxation. This study aims to investigate the associations of the effective reproductive number (Rt) of Covid-19 with ambient temperature and the implementation of physical distancing interventions in the United States (US). This study included 50 states and one territory of the US with 4,532,650 confirmed cases between 29 January and 31 July 2020. We used an interrupted time-series model with a state-level random intercept for data analysis. An interaction term of ‘physical distancing×temperature’ was included to examine their interactions. Stratified analyses by temperature and physical distancing implementation were also performed to analyse the modifying effects. The overall median (interquartile range) Rt was 1.2 (1.0–2.3). The implementation of physical distancing was associated with a 12% decrease in the risk of Rt (relative risk [RR]: 0.88, 95% confident interval [CI]: 0.86–0.89), and each 5 °C increase in temperature was associated with a 2% decrease (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97–0.98). We observed a statistically significant interaction between temperature and physical distancing implementation, but all the RRs were small (close to one). The containing effects of high temperature were attenuated by 5.1% when physical distancing was implemented. The association of COVID-19 Rt with physical distancing implementation was more stable (0.88 vs. 0.89 in days when temperature was low and high, respectively). Increased temperature did not offset the risk of Covid-19 Rt posed by the relaxation of physical distancing implementation. Our study does not recommend relaxing the implementation of physical distancing interventions in warm seasons/areas. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/324180 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.998 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Guo, Cui | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Shin Heng Teresa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Changqing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zeng, Yiqian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bo, Yacong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Yumiao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hossain, Shakhaoat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Jimmy W.M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, David W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Alexis K.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lao, Xiang Qian | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-13T03:02:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-13T03:02:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Science of the Total Environment, 2021, v. 789, article no. 147876 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-9697 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/324180 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Governments may relax physical distancing interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) containment in warm seasons/areas to prevent economic contractions. However, it is not clear whether higher temperature may offset the transmission risk posed by this relaxation. This study aims to investigate the associations of the effective reproductive number (Rt) of Covid-19 with ambient temperature and the implementation of physical distancing interventions in the United States (US). This study included 50 states and one territory of the US with 4,532,650 confirmed cases between 29 January and 31 July 2020. We used an interrupted time-series model with a state-level random intercept for data analysis. An interaction term of ‘physical distancing×temperature’ was included to examine their interactions. Stratified analyses by temperature and physical distancing implementation were also performed to analyse the modifying effects. The overall median (interquartile range) Rt was 1.2 (1.0–2.3). The implementation of physical distancing was associated with a 12% decrease in the risk of Rt (relative risk [RR]: 0.88, 95% confident interval [CI]: 0.86–0.89), and each 5 °C increase in temperature was associated with a 2% decrease (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97–0.98). We observed a statistically significant interaction between temperature and physical distancing implementation, but all the RRs were small (close to one). The containing effects of high temperature were attenuated by 5.1% when physical distancing was implemented. The association of COVID-19 Rt with physical distancing implementation was more stable (0.88 vs. 0.89 in days when temperature was low and high, respectively). Increased temperature did not offset the risk of Covid-19 Rt posed by the relaxation of physical distancing implementation. Our study does not recommend relaxing the implementation of physical distancing interventions in warm seasons/areas. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Science of the Total Environment | - |
dc.subject | Ambient temperature | - |
dc.subject | Covid-19 transmission | - |
dc.subject | Effective reproduction number | - |
dc.subject | Implementation of physical distancing interventions | - |
dc.subject | Interaction effects | - |
dc.title | Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147876 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34051508 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85106554966 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 789 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 147876 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 147876 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-1026 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000677549900014 | - |