File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States

TitlePhysical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States
Authors
KeywordsAmbient temperature
Covid-19 transmission
Effective reproduction number
Implementation of physical distancing interventions
Interaction effects
Issue Date2021
Citation
Science of the Total Environment, 2021, v. 789, article no. 147876 How to Cite?
AbstractGovernments may relax physical distancing interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) containment in warm seasons/areas to prevent economic contractions. However, it is not clear whether higher temperature may offset the transmission risk posed by this relaxation. This study aims to investigate the associations of the effective reproductive number (Rt) of Covid-19 with ambient temperature and the implementation of physical distancing interventions in the United States (US). This study included 50 states and one territory of the US with 4,532,650 confirmed cases between 29 January and 31 July 2020. We used an interrupted time-series model with a state-level random intercept for data analysis. An interaction term of ‘physical distancing×temperature’ was included to examine their interactions. Stratified analyses by temperature and physical distancing implementation were also performed to analyse the modifying effects. The overall median (interquartile range) Rt was 1.2 (1.0–2.3). The implementation of physical distancing was associated with a 12% decrease in the risk of Rt (relative risk [RR]: 0.88, 95% confident interval [CI]: 0.86–0.89), and each 5 °C increase in temperature was associated with a 2% decrease (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97–0.98). We observed a statistically significant interaction between temperature and physical distancing implementation, but all the RRs were small (close to one). The containing effects of high temperature were attenuated by 5.1% when physical distancing was implemented. The association of COVID-19 Rt with physical distancing implementation was more stable (0.88 vs. 0.89 in days when temperature was low and high, respectively). Increased temperature did not offset the risk of Covid-19 Rt posed by the relaxation of physical distancing implementation. Our study does not recommend relaxing the implementation of physical distancing interventions in warm seasons/areas.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324180
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.998
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Cui-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Shin Heng Teresa-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Changqing-
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Yiqian-
dc.contributor.authorBo, Yacong-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yumiao-
dc.contributor.authorHossain, Shakhaoat-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Jimmy W.M.-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, David W.-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Alexis K.H.-
dc.contributor.authorLao, Xiang Qian-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T03:02:03Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-13T03:02:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationScience of the Total Environment, 2021, v. 789, article no. 147876-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324180-
dc.description.abstractGovernments may relax physical distancing interventions for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) containment in warm seasons/areas to prevent economic contractions. However, it is not clear whether higher temperature may offset the transmission risk posed by this relaxation. This study aims to investigate the associations of the effective reproductive number (Rt) of Covid-19 with ambient temperature and the implementation of physical distancing interventions in the United States (US). This study included 50 states and one territory of the US with 4,532,650 confirmed cases between 29 January and 31 July 2020. We used an interrupted time-series model with a state-level random intercept for data analysis. An interaction term of ‘physical distancing×temperature’ was included to examine their interactions. Stratified analyses by temperature and physical distancing implementation were also performed to analyse the modifying effects. The overall median (interquartile range) Rt was 1.2 (1.0–2.3). The implementation of physical distancing was associated with a 12% decrease in the risk of Rt (relative risk [RR]: 0.88, 95% confident interval [CI]: 0.86–0.89), and each 5 °C increase in temperature was associated with a 2% decrease (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97–0.98). We observed a statistically significant interaction between temperature and physical distancing implementation, but all the RRs were small (close to one). The containing effects of high temperature were attenuated by 5.1% when physical distancing was implemented. The association of COVID-19 Rt with physical distancing implementation was more stable (0.88 vs. 0.89 in days when temperature was low and high, respectively). Increased temperature did not offset the risk of Covid-19 Rt posed by the relaxation of physical distancing implementation. Our study does not recommend relaxing the implementation of physical distancing interventions in warm seasons/areas.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environment-
dc.subjectAmbient temperature-
dc.subjectCovid-19 transmission-
dc.subjectEffective reproduction number-
dc.subjectImplementation of physical distancing interventions-
dc.subjectInteraction effects-
dc.titlePhysical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147876-
dc.identifier.pmid34051508-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85106554966-
dc.identifier.volume789-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 147876-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 147876-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000677549900014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats