File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Does machine-vision-assisted dynamic navigation improve the accuracy of digitally planned prosthetically guided immediate implant placement? A randomized controlled trial

TitleDoes machine-vision-assisted dynamic navigation improve the accuracy of digitally planned prosthetically guided immediate implant placement? A randomized controlled trial
Authors
Keywordsdental implants
dynamic navigation
free hand
immediate implant placement
machine vision
randomized controlled clinical trial
Issue Date2022
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2022, v. 33, n. 8, p. 804-815 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the accuracy of machine-vision (MV)-based dynamic navigation (DN)-assisted immediate implant placement with the conventional freehand technique. Material and methods: A total of 24 subjects requiring immediate implant placement in maxillary anterior teeth were randomly assigned to either the control (freehand by an experienced surgeon, n = 12) or the test group (MV-DN, n = 12). Implant platform, implant apex, angular, and depth deviations with respect to prosthetically guided digital planning and differences in implant insertion torque (ITV) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were compared between the groups. Results: MV-DN resulted in more accurate immediate implant position: significantly smaller global platform deviation (1.01 ± 0.41 mm vs. 1.51 ± 0.67 mm, p =.038), platform depth deviation (0.44 ± 0.46 mm vs. 0.95 ± 0.68 mm, p =.045), global apex deviation (0.88 ± 0.43 mm vs. 1.94 ± 0.86 mm, p =.001), and lateral apex deviation (0.68 ± 0.30 mm vs. 1.61 ± 0.88 mm, p =.004) were found in MV-DN compared to controls. No significant intergroup differences were observed for ITV and ISQ. Conclusions: MV-DN achieved more precise immediate implant position and comparable primary stability. Further trials are necessary to assess the benefits in terms of esthetics and tissue health/stability.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324397
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWei, Shi Min-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Ke-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Hong Chang-
dc.contributor.authorTonetti, Maurizio S.-
dc.contributor.authorShi, Jun Yu-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T06:36:28Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-26T06:36:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2022, v. 33, n. 8, p. 804-815-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324397-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the accuracy of machine-vision (MV)-based dynamic navigation (DN)-assisted immediate implant placement with the conventional freehand technique. Material and methods: A total of 24 subjects requiring immediate implant placement in maxillary anterior teeth were randomly assigned to either the control (freehand by an experienced surgeon, n = 12) or the test group (MV-DN, n = 12). Implant platform, implant apex, angular, and depth deviations with respect to prosthetically guided digital planning and differences in implant insertion torque (ITV) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were compared between the groups. Results: MV-DN resulted in more accurate immediate implant position: significantly smaller global platform deviation (1.01 ± 0.41 mm vs. 1.51 ± 0.67 mm, p =.038), platform depth deviation (0.44 ± 0.46 mm vs. 0.95 ± 0.68 mm, p =.045), global apex deviation (0.88 ± 0.43 mm vs. 1.94 ± 0.86 mm, p =.001), and lateral apex deviation (0.68 ± 0.30 mm vs. 1.61 ± 0.88 mm, p =.004) were found in MV-DN compared to controls. No significant intergroup differences were observed for ITV and ISQ. Conclusions: MV-DN achieved more precise immediate implant position and comparable primary stability. Further trials are necessary to assess the benefits in terms of esthetics and tissue health/stability.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research-
dc.subjectdental implants-
dc.subjectdynamic navigation-
dc.subjectfree hand-
dc.subjectimmediate implant placement-
dc.subjectmachine vision-
dc.subjectrandomized controlled clinical trial-
dc.titleDoes machine-vision-assisted dynamic navigation improve the accuracy of digitally planned prosthetically guided immediate implant placement? A randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.13961-
dc.identifier.pmid35652362-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85131920653-
dc.identifier.volume33-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage804-
dc.identifier.epage815-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0501-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000811643900001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats