File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Does endoluminal coil embolization cause distension of intracranial aneurysms?

TitleDoes endoluminal coil embolization cause distension of intracranial aneurysms?
Authors
KeywordsEmbolization
Endovascular procedures
Interventional neuroradiology
Intracranial aneurysms
Three-dimensional radiographic angiography
Volumetric analysis
Issue Date2006
Citation
Neuroradiology, 2006, v. 48, n. 9, p. 653-660 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: The aim of the present study was to determine whether intracranial aneurysms are distended after coil embolization and to evaluate the distensibility of ruptured aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling. Methods: This was a prospective study of 20 consecutive patients with 22 aneurysms, who presented with a ruptured cerebral aneurysm and were treated with endovascular coiling of the aneurysm in a single institution. A diagnostic digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and a three-dimensional radiographic angiography (3DRA) were performed with bi-plane angiography equipment (Philips V5000) immediately before and after the embolization procedure to detect volume enlargement of the aneurysm after embolization, and the extent of the enlargement. A simulation study with steel spheres was carried out to study the possible error of over-estimation of the postembolization volume due to the beam-hardening artifact. Results: There was no procedure-related rupture of the aneurysms. The percentage by volume of solid coil within the coil mass ranged from 15.78% to 82.01% in the present series. All aneurysms showed distension which ranged from 0.09% to 34.23%. The distensibility of the aneurysms was 34.23%. Error due to the beam-hardening artifact was negligible. Conclusion: Endoluminal packing of intracranial saccular aneurysms with embolization coils could cause a certain degree of distension in aneurysms treated with coil embolization, with the degree of distension up to 34.2%. Intracranial aneurysms were able to tolerate a certain degree of endoluminal distension without a risk of immediate rupture, even those that had ruptured recently. © Springer-Verlag 2006.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325128
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.806
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Simon C.H.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Wilbur C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Albert C.S.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kwok Tung-
dc.contributor.authorWong, George K.C.-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, Wai S.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:29:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:29:58Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroradiology, 2006, v. 48, n. 9, p. 653-660-
dc.identifier.issn0028-3940-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325128-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of the present study was to determine whether intracranial aneurysms are distended after coil embolization and to evaluate the distensibility of ruptured aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling. Methods: This was a prospective study of 20 consecutive patients with 22 aneurysms, who presented with a ruptured cerebral aneurysm and were treated with endovascular coiling of the aneurysm in a single institution. A diagnostic digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and a three-dimensional radiographic angiography (3DRA) were performed with bi-plane angiography equipment (Philips V5000) immediately before and after the embolization procedure to detect volume enlargement of the aneurysm after embolization, and the extent of the enlargement. A simulation study with steel spheres was carried out to study the possible error of over-estimation of the postembolization volume due to the beam-hardening artifact. Results: There was no procedure-related rupture of the aneurysms. The percentage by volume of solid coil within the coil mass ranged from 15.78% to 82.01% in the present series. All aneurysms showed distension which ranged from 0.09% to 34.23%. The distensibility of the aneurysms was 34.23%. Error due to the beam-hardening artifact was negligible. Conclusion: Endoluminal packing of intracranial saccular aneurysms with embolization coils could cause a certain degree of distension in aneurysms treated with coil embolization, with the degree of distension up to 34.2%. Intracranial aneurysms were able to tolerate a certain degree of endoluminal distension without a risk of immediate rupture, even those that had ruptured recently. © Springer-Verlag 2006.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroradiology-
dc.subjectEmbolization-
dc.subjectEndovascular procedures-
dc.subjectInterventional neuroradiology-
dc.subjectIntracranial aneurysms-
dc.subjectThree-dimensional radiographic angiography-
dc.subjectVolumetric analysis-
dc.titleDoes endoluminal coil embolization cause distension of intracranial aneurysms?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00234-006-0107-y-
dc.identifier.pmid16807743-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33748499594-
dc.identifier.volume48-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage653-
dc.identifier.epage660-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000240379200008-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats