File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Significant benefits in clinical outcome and reduced consumption of hospital resources in Hong Kong Chinese patients

TitleEndovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Significant benefits in clinical outcome and reduced consumption of hospital resources in Hong Kong Chinese patients
Authors
KeywordsAneurysm, ruptured
Cerebral arteries
Embolization, therapeutic
Intracranial aneurysm
Treatment outcome
Issue Date2007
Citation
Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2007, v. 13, n. 4, p. 271-278 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Using specific selection criteria to determine whether endovascular coiling as compared to neurosurgical clipping is associated with significant benefits, in terms of 1-year clinical outcomes and consumption of hospital resources, for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in Hong Kong Chinese patients. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University teaching hospital, Hong Kong. Patients: Records of outcomes of 169 consecutive Chinese patients, who were treated with endovascular coiling (n=80) or surgical clipping (n=89), were reviewed. All patients were followed up clinically for a mean of 55 (standard deviation, 201) months and radiologically with sequential digital subtraction angiography at 6 and 18 months after treatment. Results: The mean ages of patients were 56 (standard deviation, 13) years for the coiling group, and 57 (standard deviation, 13) years for the clipping group (P=0.575). The median aneurysm size was 4 mm in both groups (P=0.898). The severity of subarachnoid haemorrhage in the two groups did not differ (P=0.619). The rate of death or permanent disability leading to dependency (Glasgow Outcome Scale, 1-3) at 1 year was significantly lower in the coiling group (12/80, 15%) as compared to the clipping group (30/89, 34%) [P=0.005], resulting in a risk reduction of 19% (95% confidence interval, 6-32%). There were significantly more frequent admissions into the intensive care unit in the clipping group (P<0.001); the median duration of intensive care unit stay was 2 days (vs 0 days in the coiling group). The incidence of subsequent treatment procedures for residual or recurrent aneurysm was more common in the coiling group (13/80 vs 3/89; P=0.004). Conclusion: Endovascular coiling as compared to neurosurgical clipping for treatment of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with significant benefits in terms of a reduced need for intensive care unit admissions and better general clinical outcomes in Hong Kong Chinese patients.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325151
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.261

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Simon C.H.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, George K.C.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Jeffrey K.T.-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, W. S.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:30:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:30:09Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Medical Journal, 2007, v. 13, n. 4, p. 271-278-
dc.identifier.issn1024-2708-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325151-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Using specific selection criteria to determine whether endovascular coiling as compared to neurosurgical clipping is associated with significant benefits, in terms of 1-year clinical outcomes and consumption of hospital resources, for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in Hong Kong Chinese patients. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University teaching hospital, Hong Kong. Patients: Records of outcomes of 169 consecutive Chinese patients, who were treated with endovascular coiling (n=80) or surgical clipping (n=89), were reviewed. All patients were followed up clinically for a mean of 55 (standard deviation, 201) months and radiologically with sequential digital subtraction angiography at 6 and 18 months after treatment. Results: The mean ages of patients were 56 (standard deviation, 13) years for the coiling group, and 57 (standard deviation, 13) years for the clipping group (P=0.575). The median aneurysm size was 4 mm in both groups (P=0.898). The severity of subarachnoid haemorrhage in the two groups did not differ (P=0.619). The rate of death or permanent disability leading to dependency (Glasgow Outcome Scale, 1-3) at 1 year was significantly lower in the coiling group (12/80, 15%) as compared to the clipping group (30/89, 34%) [P=0.005], resulting in a risk reduction of 19% (95% confidence interval, 6-32%). There were significantly more frequent admissions into the intensive care unit in the clipping group (P<0.001); the median duration of intensive care unit stay was 2 days (vs 0 days in the coiling group). The incidence of subsequent treatment procedures for residual or recurrent aneurysm was more common in the coiling group (13/80 vs 3/89; P=0.004). Conclusion: Endovascular coiling as compared to neurosurgical clipping for treatment of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with significant benefits in terms of a reduced need for intensive care unit admissions and better general clinical outcomes in Hong Kong Chinese patients.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Medical Journal-
dc.subjectAneurysm, ruptured-
dc.subjectCerebral arteries-
dc.subjectEmbolization, therapeutic-
dc.subjectIntracranial aneurysm-
dc.subjectTreatment outcome-
dc.titleEndovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Significant benefits in clinical outcome and reduced consumption of hospital resources in Hong Kong Chinese patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid17592179-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34548232714-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage271-
dc.identifier.epage278-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats