File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Why current evidence is against flow diverters for treatment of carotid blowout syndrome

TitleWhy current evidence is against flow diverters for treatment of carotid blowout syndrome
Authors
KeywordsAneurysm
Carotid
Flow diverter
Pseudoaneurysm
Issue Date2013
Citation
European Journal of Radiology, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 191 How to Cite?
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325255
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.531
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.025

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, George Kwok Chu-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, Wai Sang-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:31:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:31:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 191-
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325255-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Radiology-
dc.subjectAneurysm-
dc.subjectCarotid-
dc.subjectFlow diverter-
dc.subjectPseudoaneurysm-
dc.titleWhy current evidence is against flow diverters for treatment of carotid blowout syndrome-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.012-
dc.identifier.pmid22297179-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84871716867-
dc.identifier.volume82-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage191-
dc.identifier.epage-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7727-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats