File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Awake craniotomy for excision of arteriovenous malformations? A qualitative comparison study with stereotactic radiosurgery

TitleAwake craniotomy for excision of arteriovenous malformations? A qualitative comparison study with stereotactic radiosurgery
Authors
KeywordsArteriovenous malformation
Awake craniotomy
Awake mapping
Eloquent
Excision
Issue Date2018
Citation
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2018, v. 51, p. 52-56 How to Cite?
AbstractTreatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVM) located at the eloquent area has been a challenge. Awake brain mapping allows identification of a non-eloquent gyrus for intervention and can potentially facilitate resection with preservation of functions. An alternative treatment option is stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The objective of this study was to perform a qualitative comparison of the treatment outcome of awake AVM excision versus SRS. We conducted a 13-year retrospective review of AVM excision under awake craniotomy performed at Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, from 2003 to 2016. Patients’ presentation, Spetzler-Martin (SM) grading, rate of obliteration and complication were reviewed and analyzed with the modified radiosurgery-based AVM score (RS score). Six patients had excision of AVM under awake mapping during this period of time. Two were SM Grade II and four were SM Grade III. Five located at the peri-rolandic region while one at the temporal language area. None had failed mapping. Five out of six achieved complete obliteration (83.3%). Qualitative comparative analysis had revealed better treatment outcome with awake AVM excision as compared to SRS with the obliteration rate of 100% versus 96% for RS score ≤1.00, 100% versus 78% for RS score 1.01–1.50, and 66% versus 50% for RS score >2.00 respectively. In conclusion, awake mapping and excision of AVMs at the eloquent area is feasible. Qualitative comparative analysis had revealed higher obliteration rate with awake AVM excision as compared to SRS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325381
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.116
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.627

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, David Yuen Chung-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Danny Tat Ming-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Cannon Xian Lun-
dc.contributor.authorKan, Patricia Kwok Yee-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Amelia Yikjin-
dc.contributor.authorHsieh, Yi Pin Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorAbrigo, Jill-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, Wai Sang-
dc.contributor.authorWong, George Kwok Chu-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:32:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:32:23Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2018, v. 51, p. 52-56-
dc.identifier.issn0967-5868-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325381-
dc.description.abstractTreatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVM) located at the eloquent area has been a challenge. Awake brain mapping allows identification of a non-eloquent gyrus for intervention and can potentially facilitate resection with preservation of functions. An alternative treatment option is stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The objective of this study was to perform a qualitative comparison of the treatment outcome of awake AVM excision versus SRS. We conducted a 13-year retrospective review of AVM excision under awake craniotomy performed at Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, from 2003 to 2016. Patients’ presentation, Spetzler-Martin (SM) grading, rate of obliteration and complication were reviewed and analyzed with the modified radiosurgery-based AVM score (RS score). Six patients had excision of AVM under awake mapping during this period of time. Two were SM Grade II and four were SM Grade III. Five located at the peri-rolandic region while one at the temporal language area. None had failed mapping. Five out of six achieved complete obliteration (83.3%). Qualitative comparative analysis had revealed better treatment outcome with awake AVM excision as compared to SRS with the obliteration rate of 100% versus 96% for RS score ≤1.00, 100% versus 78% for RS score 1.01–1.50, and 66% versus 50% for RS score >2.00 respectively. In conclusion, awake mapping and excision of AVMs at the eloquent area is feasible. Qualitative comparative analysis had revealed higher obliteration rate with awake AVM excision as compared to SRS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Neuroscience-
dc.subjectArteriovenous malformation-
dc.subjectAwake craniotomy-
dc.subjectAwake mapping-
dc.subjectEloquent-
dc.subjectExcision-
dc.titleAwake craniotomy for excision of arteriovenous malformations? A qualitative comparison study with stereotactic radiosurgery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jocn.2018.02.019-
dc.identifier.pmid29530384-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85043356183-
dc.identifier.volume51-
dc.identifier.spage52-
dc.identifier.epage56-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2653-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats