File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The use of stereotactic navigation guidance in minimally invasive transnasal nasopharyngectomy: A comparison with the conventional open transfacial approach

TitleThe use of stereotactic navigation guidance in minimally invasive transnasal nasopharyngectomy: A comparison with the conventional open transfacial approach
Authors
Issue Date2002
Citation
British Journal of Radiology, 2002, v. 75, n. 892, p. 345-350 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to study the efficacy of applying stereotactic navigation guidance to nasopharyngectomy via a minimally invasive transnasal approach as compared with the conventional open transfacial approaches. The nasopharynx is the centre of the anterior skull base, which is remote from the surface of the facial skeleton. It is well known that there are several surgical approaches for access to resect tumours from the nasopharynx. However, the open techniques have been associated with much morbidity and only provide access to, and identification of, the ipsilateral internal carotid artery that forms the lateral boundary and resection limit of the nasopharynx. The coupling of stereotactic navigation guidance and a minimally invasive transnasal approach for nasopharyngectomy allows the surgeon to identify and protect the internal carotid artery bilaterally at the nasopharynx. This technique reduces operating time and morbidity to a minimum and yet is oncologically sound for resecting nasopharyngeal lesions. We compare 15 patients who underwent the stereotactic navigation guidance approach with 20 patients who received a conventional open transfacial approach.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325607
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.812
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTo, E. W.H.-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, E. H.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, W. M.-
dc.contributor.authorLai, E. C.H.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, G. K.C.-
dc.contributor.authorSun, D. T.F.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, D. T.M.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, J. M.K.-
dc.contributor.authorAhuja, A.-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, W. S.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:34:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:34:43Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Radiology, 2002, v. 75, n. 892, p. 345-350-
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325607-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to study the efficacy of applying stereotactic navigation guidance to nasopharyngectomy via a minimally invasive transnasal approach as compared with the conventional open transfacial approaches. The nasopharynx is the centre of the anterior skull base, which is remote from the surface of the facial skeleton. It is well known that there are several surgical approaches for access to resect tumours from the nasopharynx. However, the open techniques have been associated with much morbidity and only provide access to, and identification of, the ipsilateral internal carotid artery that forms the lateral boundary and resection limit of the nasopharynx. The coupling of stereotactic navigation guidance and a minimally invasive transnasal approach for nasopharyngectomy allows the surgeon to identify and protect the internal carotid artery bilaterally at the nasopharynx. This technique reduces operating time and morbidity to a minimum and yet is oncologically sound for resecting nasopharyngeal lesions. We compare 15 patients who underwent the stereotactic navigation guidance approach with 20 patients who received a conventional open transfacial approach.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Radiology-
dc.titleThe use of stereotactic navigation guidance in minimally invasive transnasal nasopharyngectomy: A comparison with the conventional open transfacial approach-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.75.892.750345-
dc.identifier.pmid12000693-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036555241-
dc.identifier.volume75-
dc.identifier.issue892-
dc.identifier.spage345-
dc.identifier.epage350-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000175801700004-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats