File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110656
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85089277182
- WOS: WOS:000537311500020
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Experimental study and design method of shear-dominated composite plate shear walls
Title | Experimental study and design method of shear-dominated composite plate shear walls |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Boundary element Composite plate shear walls (CPSW) Reinforced concrete (RC) Shear capacity Stud connector Tie bar |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Citation | Engineering Structures, 2020, v. 215, article no. 110656 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Many skyscrapers have used the Reinforced Concrete (RC) filled Composite Plate Shear Walls (CPSW). Based on in-plane shear tests on six shear-critical CPSW specimens and a RC shear wall specimen, the behavior of CPSW systems with stud or tie bar connectors, various connector spacings, and various axial compression ratios were reported. In the test program, the Concrete Filled Steel Tubes (CFSTs) are applied for each specimen as boundary elements to simulate the engineering design of CPSW in skyscrapers. This paper presents the test observations, the ultimate capacity, the lateral stiffness, the ductility and the energy dissipation results. Based on the test results, the CPSW specimens with CFST boundary element failed in shear compression failure and the reference RC shear wall failed in shear tension failure. The weld fracture was generally found at boundary element (CFST) in the descending branch. Compared to the RC shear wall, the shear capacity of the CPSW systems were enhanced by 104–129%. The difference between CPSW systems with stud connectors and those with tie bars was insignificant in terms of ultimate capacity. Subsequently, a new database including 38 test specimens was established from the aforementioned test program and available literatures. The database results indicate the compressive capacity of infilled concrete is the dominating factor influencing the shear capacity, instead of the yield capacity of steel. In addition, a design formula for the in-plane ultimate capacity of shear-critical CPSW systems is proposed. Comparisons demonstrated that the proposed model was consistent and exhibited a reasonable level of consistency. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326233 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.661 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Jia Ji | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nie, Xin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bu, Fan Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tao, Mu Xuan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fan, Jian Sheng | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-09T09:59:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-09T09:59:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Engineering Structures, 2020, v. 215, article no. 110656 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0141-0296 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326233 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Many skyscrapers have used the Reinforced Concrete (RC) filled Composite Plate Shear Walls (CPSW). Based on in-plane shear tests on six shear-critical CPSW specimens and a RC shear wall specimen, the behavior of CPSW systems with stud or tie bar connectors, various connector spacings, and various axial compression ratios were reported. In the test program, the Concrete Filled Steel Tubes (CFSTs) are applied for each specimen as boundary elements to simulate the engineering design of CPSW in skyscrapers. This paper presents the test observations, the ultimate capacity, the lateral stiffness, the ductility and the energy dissipation results. Based on the test results, the CPSW specimens with CFST boundary element failed in shear compression failure and the reference RC shear wall failed in shear tension failure. The weld fracture was generally found at boundary element (CFST) in the descending branch. Compared to the RC shear wall, the shear capacity of the CPSW systems were enhanced by 104–129%. The difference between CPSW systems with stud connectors and those with tie bars was insignificant in terms of ultimate capacity. Subsequently, a new database including 38 test specimens was established from the aforementioned test program and available literatures. The database results indicate the compressive capacity of infilled concrete is the dominating factor influencing the shear capacity, instead of the yield capacity of steel. In addition, a design formula for the in-plane ultimate capacity of shear-critical CPSW systems is proposed. Comparisons demonstrated that the proposed model was consistent and exhibited a reasonable level of consistency. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Engineering Structures | - |
dc.subject | Boundary element | - |
dc.subject | Composite plate shear walls (CPSW) | - |
dc.subject | Reinforced concrete (RC) | - |
dc.subject | Shear capacity | - |
dc.subject | Stud connector | - |
dc.subject | Tie bar | - |
dc.title | Experimental study and design method of shear-dominated composite plate shear walls | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110656 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85089277182 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 215 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 110656 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 110656 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-7323 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000537311500020 | - |