File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Horizontal equity and efficiency at primary health care facilities in rural Afghanistan: A seemingly unrelated regression approach

TitleHorizontal equity and efficiency at primary health care facilities in rural Afghanistan: A seemingly unrelated regression approach
Authors
KeywordsAfghanistan
Efficiency
Equity
Primary health care
Seemingly unrelated regression
Issue Date2013
Citation
Social Science and Medicine, 2013, v. 89, p. 25-31 How to Cite?
AbstractProducing services efficiently and equitably are important goals for health systems. Many countries pursue horizontal equity - providing people with the same illnesses equal access to health services - by locating facilities in remote areas. Staff are often paid incentives to work at such facilities. However, there is little evidence on how many fewer people are treated at remote facilities than facilities in more densely settled areas. This research explores if there is an association between the efficiency of health centers in Afghanistan and the remoteness of their location.Survey teams collected data on facility level inputs and outputs at a stratified random sample of 579 health centers in 2005. Quality of care was measured by observing staff interact with patients and determining if staff completed a set of normative patient care tasks. We used seemingly unrelated regression to determine if facilities in remote areas have fewer outpatient visits than other rural facilities. In this analysis, one equation compares the number of outpatient visits to facility inputs, while another compares quality of care to determinants of quality.The results indicate remote facilities have about 13% fewer outpatient visits than non-remote facilities, holding inputs constant. Our analysis suggests that facilities in remote areas are realizing horizontal equity since their clients are receiving comparable quality of care to those at non-remote facilities. However, we find the average labor cost for a visit at a remote facility is $1.44, but only $0.97 at other rural facilities, indicating that a visit in a remote facility would have to be 'worth' 1.49 times a visit at a rural facility for there to be no equity - efficiency trade-off. In determining where to build or staff health centers, this loss of efficiency may be offset by progress towarda social policy objective of providing services to disadvantaged rural populations. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326936
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.954
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohns, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorSteinhardt, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Damian G.-
dc.contributor.authorPeters, David H.-
dc.contributor.authorBishai, David-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T05:27:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-31T05:27:36Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Science and Medicine, 2013, v. 89, p. 25-31-
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326936-
dc.description.abstractProducing services efficiently and equitably are important goals for health systems. Many countries pursue horizontal equity - providing people with the same illnesses equal access to health services - by locating facilities in remote areas. Staff are often paid incentives to work at such facilities. However, there is little evidence on how many fewer people are treated at remote facilities than facilities in more densely settled areas. This research explores if there is an association between the efficiency of health centers in Afghanistan and the remoteness of their location.Survey teams collected data on facility level inputs and outputs at a stratified random sample of 579 health centers in 2005. Quality of care was measured by observing staff interact with patients and determining if staff completed a set of normative patient care tasks. We used seemingly unrelated regression to determine if facilities in remote areas have fewer outpatient visits than other rural facilities. In this analysis, one equation compares the number of outpatient visits to facility inputs, while another compares quality of care to determinants of quality.The results indicate remote facilities have about 13% fewer outpatient visits than non-remote facilities, holding inputs constant. Our analysis suggests that facilities in remote areas are realizing horizontal equity since their clients are receiving comparable quality of care to those at non-remote facilities. However, we find the average labor cost for a visit at a remote facility is $1.44, but only $0.97 at other rural facilities, indicating that a visit in a remote facility would have to be 'worth' 1.49 times a visit at a rural facility for there to be no equity - efficiency trade-off. In determining where to build or staff health centers, this loss of efficiency may be offset by progress towarda social policy objective of providing services to disadvantaged rural populations. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Science and Medicine-
dc.subjectAfghanistan-
dc.subjectEfficiency-
dc.subjectEquity-
dc.subjectPrimary health care-
dc.subjectSeemingly unrelated regression-
dc.titleHorizontal equity and efficiency at primary health care facilities in rural Afghanistan: A seemingly unrelated regression approach-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.012-
dc.identifier.pmid23726212-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84878449270-
dc.identifier.volume89-
dc.identifier.spage25-
dc.identifier.epage31-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5347-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000320907000004-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats