File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/17441692.2013.769613
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84882273657
- WOS: WOS:000326350900032
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Large-scale road safety programmes in low- and middle-income countries: An opportunity to generate evidence
Title | Large-scale road safety programmes in low- and middle-income countries: An opportunity to generate evidence |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | developing countries evaluation injury prevention road safety road traffic injuries |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Citation | Global Public Health, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 504-518 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The growing burden of road traffic injuries, which kill over 1.2 million people yearly, falls mostly on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this, evidence generation on the effectiveness of road safety interventions in LMIC settings remains scarce. This paper explores a scientific approach for evaluating road safety programmes in LMICs and introduces such a road safety multi-country initiative, the Road Safety in 10 Countries Project (RS-10). By building on existing evaluation frameworks, we develop a scientific approach for evaluating large-scale road safety programmes in LMIC settings. This also draws on '13 lessons' of large-scale programme evaluation: defining the evaluation scope; selecting study sites; maintaining objectivity; developing an impact model; utilising multiple data sources; using multiple analytic techniques; maximising external validity; ensuring an appropriate time frame; the importance of flexibility and a stepwise approach; continuous monitoring; providing feedback to implementers, policy-makers; promoting the uptake of evaluation results; and understanding evaluation costs. The use of relatively new approaches for evaluation of real-world programmes allows for the production of relevant knowledge. The RS-10 project affords an important opportunity to scientifically test these approaches for a real-world, large-scale road safety evaluation and generate new knowledge for the field of road safety. © 2013 Taylor & Francis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326946 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.037 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hyder, Adnan A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Allen, Katharine A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peters, David H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chandran, Aruna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bishai, David | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-31T05:27:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-31T05:27:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Global Public Health, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 504-518 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1744-1692 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326946 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The growing burden of road traffic injuries, which kill over 1.2 million people yearly, falls mostly on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this, evidence generation on the effectiveness of road safety interventions in LMIC settings remains scarce. This paper explores a scientific approach for evaluating road safety programmes in LMICs and introduces such a road safety multi-country initiative, the Road Safety in 10 Countries Project (RS-10). By building on existing evaluation frameworks, we develop a scientific approach for evaluating large-scale road safety programmes in LMIC settings. This also draws on '13 lessons' of large-scale programme evaluation: defining the evaluation scope; selecting study sites; maintaining objectivity; developing an impact model; utilising multiple data sources; using multiple analytic techniques; maximising external validity; ensuring an appropriate time frame; the importance of flexibility and a stepwise approach; continuous monitoring; providing feedback to implementers, policy-makers; promoting the uptake of evaluation results; and understanding evaluation costs. The use of relatively new approaches for evaluation of real-world programmes allows for the production of relevant knowledge. The RS-10 project affords an important opportunity to scientifically test these approaches for a real-world, large-scale road safety evaluation and generate new knowledge for the field of road safety. © 2013 Taylor & Francis. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Global Public Health | - |
dc.subject | developing countries | - |
dc.subject | evaluation | - |
dc.subject | injury prevention | - |
dc.subject | road safety | - |
dc.subject | road traffic injuries | - |
dc.title | Large-scale road safety programmes in low- and middle-income countries: An opportunity to generate evidence | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17441692.2013.769613 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84882273657 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 504 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 518 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1744-1706 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000326350900032 | - |