File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Neurocognitive Correlates of Young Drivers' Performance in a Driving Simulator

TitleNeurocognitive Correlates of Young Drivers' Performance in a Driving Simulator
Authors
KeywordsAdolescent
Attention
Driving
Driving simulator
Executive function
Issue Date2016
Citation
Journal of Adolescent Health, 2016, v. 58, n. 4, p. 467-473 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose Differences in neurocognitive functioning may contribute to driving performance among young drivers. However, few studies have examined this relation. This pilot study investigated whether common neurocognitive measures were associated with driving performance among young drivers in a driving simulator. Methods Young drivers (19.8 years (standard deviation [SD] = 1.9; N = 74)) participated in a battery of neurocognitive assessments measuring general intellectual capacity (Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient, FSIQ) and executive functioning, including the Stroop Color-Word Test (cognitive inhibition), Wisconsin Card Sort Test-64 (cognitive flexibility), and Attention Network Task (alerting, orienting, and executive attention). Participants then drove in a simulated vehicle under two conditions - a baseline and driving challenge. During the driving challenge, participants completed a verbal working memory task to increase demand on executive attention. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the relations between the neurocognitive measures and driving performance under the two conditions. Results FSIQ, cognitive inhibition, and alerting were associated with better driving performance at baseline. FSIQ and cognitive inhibition were also associated with better driving performance during the verbal challenge. Measures of cognitive flexibility, orienting, and conflict executive control were not associated with driving performance under either condition. Conclusions FSIQ and, to some extent, measures of executive function are associated with driving performance in a driving simulator. Further research is needed to determine if executive function is associated with more advanced driving performance under conditions that demand greater cognitive load.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/327093
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.265
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuinosso, Stephanie A.-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Sara B.-
dc.contributor.authorSchultheis, Maria T.-
dc.contributor.authorGraefe, Anna C.-
dc.contributor.authorBishai, David M.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T05:28:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-31T05:28:45Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adolescent Health, 2016, v. 58, n. 4, p. 467-473-
dc.identifier.issn1054-139X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/327093-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Differences in neurocognitive functioning may contribute to driving performance among young drivers. However, few studies have examined this relation. This pilot study investigated whether common neurocognitive measures were associated with driving performance among young drivers in a driving simulator. Methods Young drivers (19.8 years (standard deviation [SD] = 1.9; N = 74)) participated in a battery of neurocognitive assessments measuring general intellectual capacity (Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient, FSIQ) and executive functioning, including the Stroop Color-Word Test (cognitive inhibition), Wisconsin Card Sort Test-64 (cognitive flexibility), and Attention Network Task (alerting, orienting, and executive attention). Participants then drove in a simulated vehicle under two conditions - a baseline and driving challenge. During the driving challenge, participants completed a verbal working memory task to increase demand on executive attention. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the relations between the neurocognitive measures and driving performance under the two conditions. Results FSIQ, cognitive inhibition, and alerting were associated with better driving performance at baseline. FSIQ and cognitive inhibition were also associated with better driving performance during the verbal challenge. Measures of cognitive flexibility, orienting, and conflict executive control were not associated with driving performance under either condition. Conclusions FSIQ and, to some extent, measures of executive function are associated with driving performance in a driving simulator. Further research is needed to determine if executive function is associated with more advanced driving performance under conditions that demand greater cognitive load.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adolescent Health-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectAttention-
dc.subjectDriving-
dc.subjectDriving simulator-
dc.subjectExecutive function-
dc.titleNeurocognitive Correlates of Young Drivers' Performance in a Driving Simulator-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.12.018-
dc.identifier.pmid27013272-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84962288184-
dc.identifier.volume58-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage467-
dc.identifier.epage473-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1972-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000372717500014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats