File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2831916
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85047014707
- WOS: WOS:000440204900003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Algorithms for calculating topographic parameters and their uncertainties in downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) estimation
Title | Algorithms for calculating topographic parameters and their uncertainties in downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) estimation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) remote sensing terrain parameter |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, v. 15, n. 8, p. 1149-1153 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) plays an important role in the earth's surface energy budget. However, it has significant spatialoral heterogeneity over the rugged terrain. To accurately capture DSSR, many analytical terrain parameter algorithms based on digital elevation models (DEMs) have been proposed. However, the uncertainties of the DSSR components associated with these algorithms remain unclear. In this letter, we compared three types of terrain parameter algorithms and their respective DSSR component uncertainties at different spatial scales by using 3-D discrete anisotropic radiative model simulations under different atmospheric conditions. The comparison results indicated that differences in slopes, sky view factors, and terrain view factors can be up to 4°, 0.165°, and 0.264°, respectively. For a high atmospheric visibility, the maximum discrepancies of direct solar irradiance and adjacent terrain-reflected irradiance over the high reflective surface (e.g., fresh snow and ice) are 26.7 and 42.8 W m2, respectively. In addition, for a low atmospheric visibility, a maximum difference of 31 W m2 is identified for diffuse skylight. These uncertainties are nonnegligible when using a high-resolution DEM (e.g., 30 m), but as the DEM resolution becomes coarser, the uncertainties decrease. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/327190 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.248 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Shengbiao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wen, Jianguang | - |
dc.contributor.author | You, Dongqin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Hailong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Xiao, Qing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Qinhuo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-31T05:29:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-31T05:29:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, v. 15, n. 8, p. 1149-1153 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1545-598X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/327190 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) plays an important role in the earth's surface energy budget. However, it has significant spatialoral heterogeneity over the rugged terrain. To accurately capture DSSR, many analytical terrain parameter algorithms based on digital elevation models (DEMs) have been proposed. However, the uncertainties of the DSSR components associated with these algorithms remain unclear. In this letter, we compared three types of terrain parameter algorithms and their respective DSSR component uncertainties at different spatial scales by using 3-D discrete anisotropic radiative model simulations under different atmospheric conditions. The comparison results indicated that differences in slopes, sky view factors, and terrain view factors can be up to 4°, 0.165°, and 0.264°, respectively. For a high atmospheric visibility, the maximum discrepancies of direct solar irradiance and adjacent terrain-reflected irradiance over the high reflective surface (e.g., fresh snow and ice) are 26.7 and 42.8 W m2, respectively. In addition, for a low atmospheric visibility, a maximum difference of 31 W m2 is identified for diffuse skylight. These uncertainties are nonnegligible when using a high-resolution DEM (e.g., 30 m), but as the DEM resolution becomes coarser, the uncertainties decrease. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters | - |
dc.subject | Downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) | - |
dc.subject | remote sensing | - |
dc.subject | terrain parameter | - |
dc.title | Algorithms for calculating topographic parameters and their uncertainties in downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) estimation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2831916 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85047014707 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1149 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1153 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1558-0571 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000440204900003 | - |