File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.005
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85063432781
- WOS: WOS:000469152700029
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The definition of remotely sensed reflectance quantities suitable for rugged terrain
Title | The definition of remotely sensed reflectance quantities suitable for rugged terrain |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | BRDF/BRF DART model Remote sensing Rugged terrain Standardization |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, v. 225, p. 403-415 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The anisotropic scattering behavior of land surface is characterized by its bidirectional reflectance-distribution function (BRDF). However, a physically consistent BRDF definition is still lacking for heterogeneous and rugged terrain that accounts for approximately 24% of Earth's land surface. In this study, we revisited current BRDF definitions and updated them for rugged terrain with few dependent parameters: illumination and viewing geometries, terrain shadows, effective areas of illumination and observation, and anisotropic reflectance properties of subpixel-scale slopes. Furthermore, the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF), hemispherical-directional reflectance factor (HDRF), directional-hemispheric reflectance (DHR), and bi-hemispherical reflectance (BHR) were proposed within the current physical framework of reflectance quantities. These reflectance quantities have been adopted by the 3-D Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model to provide the simulations of remote sensing images. To highlight the importance of a proper usage of such reflectance terms, we used DART simulations to present the topographic effects on these reflectance quantities. Finally, the other issues with respect to surface BRDF/BRF, such as spatial scale of rugged terrain, characterization of anisotropic reflectance of micro-scale surfaces, derivative reflectance quantities, topographic parameters, wavelength dependence and reciprocity, and future perspective were discussed. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/327231 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 11.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.310 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Shengbiao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wen, Jianguang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean Philippe | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Qinhuo | - |
dc.contributor.author | You, Dongqin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Xiao, Qing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hao, Da Lei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Xingwen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yin, Tiangang | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-31T05:29:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-31T05:29:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, v. 225, p. 403-415 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0034-4257 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/327231 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The anisotropic scattering behavior of land surface is characterized by its bidirectional reflectance-distribution function (BRDF). However, a physically consistent BRDF definition is still lacking for heterogeneous and rugged terrain that accounts for approximately 24% of Earth's land surface. In this study, we revisited current BRDF definitions and updated them for rugged terrain with few dependent parameters: illumination and viewing geometries, terrain shadows, effective areas of illumination and observation, and anisotropic reflectance properties of subpixel-scale slopes. Furthermore, the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF), hemispherical-directional reflectance factor (HDRF), directional-hemispheric reflectance (DHR), and bi-hemispherical reflectance (BHR) were proposed within the current physical framework of reflectance quantities. These reflectance quantities have been adopted by the 3-D Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model to provide the simulations of remote sensing images. To highlight the importance of a proper usage of such reflectance terms, we used DART simulations to present the topographic effects on these reflectance quantities. Finally, the other issues with respect to surface BRDF/BRF, such as spatial scale of rugged terrain, characterization of anisotropic reflectance of micro-scale surfaces, derivative reflectance quantities, topographic parameters, wavelength dependence and reciprocity, and future perspective were discussed. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Remote Sensing of Environment | - |
dc.subject | BRDF/BRF | - |
dc.subject | DART model | - |
dc.subject | Remote sensing | - |
dc.subject | Rugged terrain | - |
dc.subject | Standardization | - |
dc.title | The definition of remotely sensed reflectance quantities suitable for rugged terrain | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.005 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85063432781 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 225 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 403 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 415 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000469152700029 | - |