File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990-2003): Evidence that constitutes a wake-up call

TitleEvaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990-2003): Evidence that constitutes a wake-up call
Authors
KeywordsCriteriology
Evaluation
Evaluative criteria
Qualitative research
Social work literature
Issue Date2005
Citation
Research on Social Work Practice, 2005, v. 15, n. 3, p. 180-194 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in social work should be cautious and social workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for social workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out. © 2005 Sage Publications.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/327934
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.665
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShek, Daniel T.L.-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Vera M.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorHan, X. Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T06:52:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-05T06:52:46Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationResearch on Social Work Practice, 2005, v. 15, n. 3, p. 180-194-
dc.identifier.issn1049-7315-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/327934-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in social work should be cautious and social workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for social workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out. © 2005 Sage Publications.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofResearch on Social Work Practice-
dc.subjectCriteriology-
dc.subjectEvaluation-
dc.subjectEvaluative criteria-
dc.subjectQualitative research-
dc.subjectSocial work literature-
dc.titleEvaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990-2003): Evidence that constitutes a wake-up call-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1049731504271603-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-17444404904-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage180-
dc.identifier.epage194-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000228168800004-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats