File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Gender recognition at the crossroads: Four models and the compass of comparative law

TitleGender recognition at the crossroads: Four models and the compass of comparative law
Authors
Issue Date2023
Citation
International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2023, v. 21, n. 2, p. 574-602 How to Cite?
AbstractThe article explores the different constitutional developments of the right to gender recognition and discusses their potential to protect trans and nonbinary people. Focusing on a few selected jurisdictions, each incarnating a specific kind of recognition system, it also proposes a conceptual map to understand and identify the different shapes of such a right. The article argues that four types of gender recognition can be identified, each with their own characteristics, advantages, peculiarities, and set of challenges for trans and nonbinary people and for the system of gender categorization itself. In clarifying this area of law, the article contends that the very process of creation and policing of gender identities and categories represents a critical aspect of contemporary gender constitutionalism.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328863
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.463
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOsella, Stefano-
dc.contributor.authorRubio-Marín, Ruth-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-22T06:24:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-22T06:24:44Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Constitutional Law, 2023, v. 21, n. 2, p. 574-602-
dc.identifier.issn1474-2640-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328863-
dc.description.abstractThe article explores the different constitutional developments of the right to gender recognition and discusses their potential to protect trans and nonbinary people. Focusing on a few selected jurisdictions, each incarnating a specific kind of recognition system, it also proposes a conceptual map to understand and identify the different shapes of such a right. The article argues that four types of gender recognition can be identified, each with their own characteristics, advantages, peculiarities, and set of challenges for trans and nonbinary people and for the system of gender categorization itself. In clarifying this area of law, the article contends that the very process of creation and policing of gender identities and categories represents a critical aspect of contemporary gender constitutionalism.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Constitutional Law-
dc.titleGender recognition at the crossroads: Four models and the compass of comparative law-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icon/moad045-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85164016867-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage574-
dc.identifier.epage602-
dc.identifier.eissn1474-2659-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000994082600001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats