File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Are dental x-rays safe? Content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos

TitleAre dental x-rays safe? Content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos
Authors
KeywordsALARA
health
information
internet
media
quality
radiation safety
YouTube
Issue Date1-Jan-2023
PublisherSAGE Publications
Citation
Digital Health, 2023, v. 9 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective

This study provided a content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos related to dental radiation safety.

Method

The search string, entered in English and Chinese respectively, was: (dental x-ray safe). The searches were performed and exported with Apify YouTube scraper. By screening the resultant videos and their related videos (as recommended by YouTube), a total of 89 videos were screened. Finally, 45 videos (36 English and nine Chinese) were included and analyzed. The specific information regarding dental radiation was evaluated. The Patient Education Material Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials was used to assess understandability and actionability.

Results

There was no significant difference between the English and Chinese videos in terms of view count, like count, comment count, and video duration. Half of the videos explicitly reassured the audience that dental x-rays are safe. Two of the English videos specifically stated that dental x-rays do not cause cancers. Numerous analogies were made in regard to radiation dose, such as equivalence to taking a flight or eating some bananas. About 41.7% of the English videos and 33.3% of the Chinese videos mentioned that patients could be further protected from scatter radiation by wearing a lead apron and thyroid collar. Videos had a good understandability score (91.3) but a poor actionability score (0).

Conclusions

Some of the analogies and the claimed radiation dose were questionable. One Chinese video even wrongly stated that dental x-rays are nonionizing radiation. The videos generally did not mention their information sources or the underlying radiation protection principles.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329043
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.767
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Andy Wai Kan-
dc.contributor.authorParvanov, Emil D-
dc.contributor.authorHorbańczuk, Jarosław Olav-
dc.contributor.authorKletecka-Pulker, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorKimberger, Oliver-
dc.contributor.authorWillschke, Harald-
dc.contributor.authorAtanasov, Atanas G-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-05T07:54:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-05T07:54:51Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationDigital Health, 2023, v. 9-
dc.identifier.issn2055-2076-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329043-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objective</h3><p>This study provided a content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos related to dental radiation safety.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>The search string, entered in English and Chinese respectively, was: (dental x-ray safe). The searches were performed and exported with Apify YouTube scraper. By screening the resultant videos and their related videos (as recommended by YouTube), a total of 89 videos were screened. Finally, 45 videos (36 English and nine Chinese) were included and analyzed. The specific information regarding dental radiation was evaluated. The Patient Education Material Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials was used to assess understandability and actionability.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference between the English and Chinese videos in terms of view count, like count, comment count, and video duration. Half of the videos explicitly reassured the audience that dental x-rays are safe. Two of the English videos specifically stated that dental x-rays do not cause cancers. Numerous analogies were made in regard to radiation dose, such as equivalence to taking a flight or eating some bananas. About 41.7% of the English videos and 33.3% of the Chinese videos mentioned that patients could be further protected from scatter radiation by wearing a lead apron and thyroid collar. Videos had a good understandability score (91.3) but a poor actionability score (0).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Some of the analogies and the claimed radiation dose were questionable. One Chinese video even wrongly stated that dental x-rays are nonionizing radiation. The videos generally did not mention their information sources or the underlying radiation protection principles.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofDigital Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectALARA-
dc.subjecthealth-
dc.subjectinformation-
dc.subjectinternet-
dc.subjectmedia-
dc.subjectquality-
dc.subjectradiation safety-
dc.subjectYouTube-
dc.titleAre dental x-rays safe? Content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/20552076231179053-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85161292967-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.eissn2055-2076-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001003768000001-
dc.identifier.issnl2055-2076-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats