File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s10554-023-02909-8
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85163447835
- WOS: WOS:001018125600001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Intraventricular 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study
Title | Intraventricular 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study |
---|---|
Authors | Kwan, Chi TingChing, On Hang SamuelYap, Pui MinFung, Sau YungTang, Hok ShingTse, Wan Wai VivianKwan, Cheuk Nam FelixChow, Yin Hay PhoebeYiu, Nga ChingLee, Yung PokLau, Jessica Wing KaFong, Ambrose Ho TungRen, Qing-WenWu, Mei-ZhenWan, Eric Yuk FaiLee, Ka Chun KevinLeung, Chun YuLi, AndrewMontero, DavidVardhanabhuti, VarutHai, Jojo Siu HanSiu, Chung WahTse, Hung FatZingan, ValentinZhao, XiaoxiWang, HaonanPennell, Dudley JohnMohiaddin, RaadSenior, RoxyYiu, Kai HangNg, Ming Yen |
Keywords | 4D flow Cardiovascular magnetic resonance Direct flow HFpEF Intraventricular flow Residual Volume |
Issue Date | 28-Jun-2023 |
Publisher | Springer |
Citation | The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Intraventricular four-dimensional flow (4D flow) phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess different components of left ventricular (LV) flow including direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume. This could be utilised to identify HFpEF. This study investigated if intraventricular 4D flow CMR could differentiate HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls. Suspected HFpEF patients and asymptomatic controls were recruited prospectively. HFpEF patients were confirmed using European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 expert recommendations. Non-HFpEF patients were diagnosed if suspected HFpEF patients did not fulfil ESC 2021 criteria. LV direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume were obtained from 4D flow CMR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. 63 subjects (25 HFpEF patients, 22 non-HFpEF patients and 16 asymptomatic controls) were included in this study. 46% were male, mean age 69.8 ± 9.1 years. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume could differentiate HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls (p < 0.001 for both) as well as HFpEF vs non-HFpEF patients (p = 0.021 and p = 0.005, respectively). Among the 4 parameters, direct flow had the largest area under curve (AUC) of 0.781 when comparing HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls, while residual volume had the largest AUC of 0.740 when comparing HFpEF and non-HFpEF patients. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume show promise in differentiating HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329108 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.694 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kwan, Chi Ting | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ching, On Hang Samuel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yap, Pui Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fung, Sau Yung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, Hok Shing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, Wan Wai Vivian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwan, Cheuk Nam Felix | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chow, Yin Hay Phoebe | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yiu, Nga Ching | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yung Pok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Jessica Wing Ka | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fong, Ambrose Ho Tung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ren, Qing-Wen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Mei-Zhen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wan, Eric Yuk Fai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Ka Chun Kevin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, Chun Yu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Andrew | - |
dc.contributor.author | Montero, David | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vardhanabhuti, Varut | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hai, Jojo Siu Han | - |
dc.contributor.author | Siu, Chung Wah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, Hung Fat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zingan, Valentin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Xiaoxi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Haonan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pennell, Dudley John | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mohiaddin, Raad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Senior, Roxy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yiu, Kai Hang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Ming Yen | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-05T07:55:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-05T07:55:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-28 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1569-5794 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329108 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Intraventricular four-dimensional flow (4D flow) phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess different components of left ventricular (LV) flow including direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume. This could be utilised to identify HFpEF. This study investigated if intraventricular 4D flow CMR could differentiate HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls. Suspected HFpEF patients and asymptomatic controls were recruited prospectively. HFpEF patients were confirmed using European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 expert recommendations. Non-HFpEF patients were diagnosed if suspected HFpEF patients did not fulfil ESC 2021 criteria. LV direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume were obtained from 4D flow CMR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. 63 subjects (25 HFpEF patients, 22 non-HFpEF patients and 16 asymptomatic controls) were included in this study. 46% were male, mean age 69.8 ± 9.1 years. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume could differentiate HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls (p < 0.001 for both) as well as HFpEF vs non-HFpEF patients (p = 0.021 and p = 0.005, respectively). Among the 4 parameters, direct flow had the largest area under curve (AUC) of 0.781 when comparing HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls, while residual volume had the largest AUC of 0.740 when comparing HFpEF and non-HFpEF patients. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume show promise in differentiating HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | - |
dc.subject | 4D flow | - |
dc.subject | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance | - |
dc.subject | Direct flow | - |
dc.subject | HFpEF | - |
dc.subject | Intraventricular flow | - |
dc.subject | Residual Volume | - |
dc.title | Intraventricular 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10554-023-02909-8 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85163447835 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-0743 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001018125600001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1569-5794 | - |