File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An analytical framework of “zero waste construction site”: Two case studies of Shenzhen, China

TitleAn analytical framework of “zero waste construction site”: Two case studies of Shenzhen, China
Authors
KeywordsConstruction and demolition waste
Construction waste management
Net zero building
Zero waste site
Issue Date15-Feb-2021
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Waste Management, 2021, v. 121, p. 343-353 How to Cite?
Abstract

Around the global construction industry, there is an emerging trend to pursue a “zero-waste” goal at the site level, but little is known about it. This paper aims to shed insights on the waste management concept of “zero waste construction site” by delineating its meaning, system boundary, assessment period, and operation strategies, which are further formulated in an analytical framework. Owing to the nascent nature of the concept, we adopted a qualitative approach including archival study, a series of semi-structured interviews, and two in-depth case studies in Shenzhen, China to sketch the analytical framework. Meanwhile, an analogy between “zero waste construction site” and “net zero building” is continuously made to fine-tune and finalize the framework. This research demonstrates that the zero-waste goal is challenging but achievable on individual construction sites. The system boundary to examine the zero-waste goal is contingent on the project scope, be it a new construction, renovation, or demolition project. The assessment period is dependent on the duration of the construction project. However, it would be too costly, if not entirely impossible, to achieve a “zero waste construction site” by treating it as a closed system. Rather, one needs to consider open, off-site strategies, e.g., engaging third-party recycling services, reusing recycled materials in subsequent projects, or trading it in to a recycled material market. The analytical framework can be utilized to scrutinize existing construction waste management practices. In the long term, the research will contribute positively to a “zero waste” society. 


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329152
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.734
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, Weisheng-
dc.contributor.authorBao, Zhikang-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Wendy-
dc.contributor.authorChi, Bin-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jiayuan-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-05T07:55:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-05T07:55:41Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-15-
dc.identifier.citationWaste Management, 2021, v. 121, p. 343-353-
dc.identifier.issn0956-053X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329152-
dc.description.abstract<p>Around the global construction industry, there is an emerging trend to pursue a “zero-waste” goal at the site level, but little is known about it. This paper aims to shed insights on the <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/waste-management" title="Learn more about waste management from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">waste management</a> concept of “zero waste construction site” by delineating its meaning, system boundary, assessment period, and operation strategies, which are further formulated in an analytical framework. Owing to the nascent nature of the concept, we adopted a qualitative approach including archival study, a series of semi-structured interviews, and two in-depth case studies in Shenzhen, China to sketch the analytical framework. Meanwhile, an analogy between “zero waste construction site” and “net zero building” is continuously made to fine-tune and finalize the framework. This research demonstrates that the zero-waste goal is challenging but achievable on individual construction sites. The system boundary to examine the zero-waste goal is contingent on the project scope, be it a new construction, renovation, or demolition project. The assessment period is dependent on the duration of the construction project. However, it would be too costly, if not entirely impossible, to achieve a “zero waste construction site” by treating it as a closed system. Rather, one needs to consider open, off-site strategies, e.g., engaging third-party recycling services, reusing recycled materials in subsequent projects, or trading it in to a recycled material market. The analytical framework can be utilized to scrutinize existing construction waste management practices. In the long term, the research will contribute positively to a “zero waste” society.<span> </span></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofWaste Management-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectConstruction and demolition waste-
dc.subjectConstruction waste management-
dc.subjectNet zero building-
dc.subjectZero waste site-
dc.titleAn analytical framework of “zero waste construction site”: Two case studies of Shenzhen, China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.029-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85099023201-
dc.identifier.volume121-
dc.identifier.spage343-
dc.identifier.epage353-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000614575500003-
dc.identifier.issnl0956-053X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats