File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: On linking an Earth system model to the equilibrium carbon representation of an economically optimizing land use model

TitleOn linking an Earth system model to the equilibrium carbon representation of an economically optimizing land use model
Authors
Issue Date2014
Citation
Geoscientific Model Development, 2014, v. 7, n. 6, p. 2545-2555 How to Cite?
AbstractHuman activities are significantly altering biogeochemical cycles at the global scale, and the scope of these activities will change with both future climate and socioeconomic decisions. This poses a significant challenge for Earth system models (ESMs), which can incorporate land use change as prescribed inputs but do not actively simulate the policy or economic forces that drive land use change. One option to address this problem is to couple an ESM with an economically oriented integrated assessment model, but this is challenging because of the radically different goals and underpinnings of each type of model. This study describes the development and testing of a coupling between the terrestrial carbon cycle of an ESM (CESM) and an integrated assessment (GCAM) model, focusing on how CESM climate effects on the carbon cycle could be shared with GCAM. We examine the best proxy variables to share between the models, and we quantify how carbon flux changes driven by climate, CO2 fertilization, and land use changes (e.g., deforestation) can be distinguished from each other by GCAM. The net primary production and heterotrophic respiration outputs of the Community Land Model (CLM), the land component of CESM, were found to be the most robust proxy variables by which to recalculate GCAM's assumptions of equilibrium ecosystem steady-state carbon. Carbon cycle effects of land use change are spatially limited relative to climate effects, and thus we were able to distinguish these effects successfully in the model coupling, passing only the latter to GCAM. This paper does not present results of a fully coupled simulation but shows, using a series of offline CLM simulations and an additional idealized Monte Carlo simulation, that our CESM-GCAM proxy variables reflect the phenomena that we intend and do not contain erroneous signals due to land use change. By allowing climate effects from a full ESM to dynamically modulate the economic and policy decisions of an integrated assessment model, this work will help link these models in a robust and flexible framework capable of examining two-way interactions between human and Earth system processes.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329339
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.055
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBond-Lamberty, B.-
dc.contributor.authorCalvin, K.-
dc.contributor.authorJones, A. D.-
dc.contributor.authorMao, J.-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, P.-
dc.contributor.authorShi, X. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorThomson, A.-
dc.contributor.authorThornton, P.-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:32:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:32:05Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationGeoscientific Model Development, 2014, v. 7, n. 6, p. 2545-2555-
dc.identifier.issn1991-959X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329339-
dc.description.abstractHuman activities are significantly altering biogeochemical cycles at the global scale, and the scope of these activities will change with both future climate and socioeconomic decisions. This poses a significant challenge for Earth system models (ESMs), which can incorporate land use change as prescribed inputs but do not actively simulate the policy or economic forces that drive land use change. One option to address this problem is to couple an ESM with an economically oriented integrated assessment model, but this is challenging because of the radically different goals and underpinnings of each type of model. This study describes the development and testing of a coupling between the terrestrial carbon cycle of an ESM (CESM) and an integrated assessment (GCAM) model, focusing on how CESM climate effects on the carbon cycle could be shared with GCAM. We examine the best proxy variables to share between the models, and we quantify how carbon flux changes driven by climate, CO2 fertilization, and land use changes (e.g., deforestation) can be distinguished from each other by GCAM. The net primary production and heterotrophic respiration outputs of the Community Land Model (CLM), the land component of CESM, were found to be the most robust proxy variables by which to recalculate GCAM's assumptions of equilibrium ecosystem steady-state carbon. Carbon cycle effects of land use change are spatially limited relative to climate effects, and thus we were able to distinguish these effects successfully in the model coupling, passing only the latter to GCAM. This paper does not present results of a fully coupled simulation but shows, using a series of offline CLM simulations and an additional idealized Monte Carlo simulation, that our CESM-GCAM proxy variables reflect the phenomena that we intend and do not contain erroneous signals due to land use change. By allowing climate effects from a full ESM to dynamically modulate the economic and policy decisions of an integrated assessment model, this work will help link these models in a robust and flexible framework capable of examining two-way interactions between human and Earth system processes.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofGeoscientific Model Development-
dc.titleOn linking an Earth system model to the equilibrium carbon representation of an economically optimizing land use model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/gmd-7-2545-2014-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84908635291-
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage2545-
dc.identifier.epage2555-
dc.identifier.eissn1991-9603-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000346142200001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats