File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: 21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating

Title21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating
Authors
KeywordsClimate change
Earth system model
Integrated assessment
Mitigation
Water deficit
Issue Date2015
Citation
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, v. 112, n. 34, p. 10635-10640 How to Cite?
AbstractThere is evidence that warming leads to greater evapotranspiration and surface drying, thus contributing to increasing intensity and duration of drought and implying that mitigation would reduce water stresses. However, understanding the overall impact of climate change mitigation on water resources requires accounting for the second part of the equation, i.e., the impact of mitigationinduced changes in water demands from human activities. By using integrated, high-resolution models of human and natural system processes to understand potential synergies and/or constraints within the climate-energy-water nexus, we show that in the United States, over the course of the 21st century and under one set of consistent socioeconomics, the reductions in water stress from slower rates of climate change resulting from emission mitigation are overwhelmed by the increased water stress from the emissions mitigation itself. The finding that the human dimension outpaces the benefits from mitigating climate change is contradictory to the general perception that climate change mitigation improves water conditions. This research shows the potential for unintended and negative consequences of climate change mitigation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329374
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.737
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHejazi, Mohamad I.-
dc.contributor.authorVoisin, Nathalie-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Lu-
dc.contributor.authorBramer, Lisa M.-
dc.contributor.authorFortin, Daniel C.-
dc.contributor.authorHathaway, John E.-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Maoyi-
dc.contributor.authorKyle, Page-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, L. Ruby-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hong Yi-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ying-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Pralit L.-
dc.contributor.authorPulsipher, Trenton C.-
dc.contributor.authorRice, Jennie S.-
dc.contributor.authorTesfa, Teklu K.-
dc.contributor.authorVernon, Chris R.-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Yuyu-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:32:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:32:20Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, v. 112, n. 34, p. 10635-10640-
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329374-
dc.description.abstractThere is evidence that warming leads to greater evapotranspiration and surface drying, thus contributing to increasing intensity and duration of drought and implying that mitigation would reduce water stresses. However, understanding the overall impact of climate change mitigation on water resources requires accounting for the second part of the equation, i.e., the impact of mitigationinduced changes in water demands from human activities. By using integrated, high-resolution models of human and natural system processes to understand potential synergies and/or constraints within the climate-energy-water nexus, we show that in the United States, over the course of the 21st century and under one set of consistent socioeconomics, the reductions in water stress from slower rates of climate change resulting from emission mitigation are overwhelmed by the increased water stress from the emissions mitigation itself. The finding that the human dimension outpaces the benefits from mitigating climate change is contradictory to the general perception that climate change mitigation improves water conditions. This research shows the potential for unintended and negative consequences of climate change mitigation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-
dc.subjectClimate change-
dc.subjectEarth system model-
dc.subjectIntegrated assessment-
dc.subjectMitigation-
dc.subjectWater deficit-
dc.title21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1421675112-
dc.identifier.pmid26240363-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84940506220-
dc.identifier.volume112-
dc.identifier.issue34-
dc.identifier.spage10635-
dc.identifier.epage10640-
dc.identifier.eissn1091-6490-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000360005600042-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats