File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Measurement of the zygomatic region for the optimal placement of quad zygomatic implants

TitleMeasurement of the zygomatic region for the optimal placement of quad zygomatic implants
Authors
Keywordsbone-to-implant contact
edentulous maxilla
zygomatic implants
zygomatic thickness
Issue Date2017
Citation
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2017, v. 19, n. 5, p. 841-848 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The zygomatic implant is suggested to be placed in zygomatic areas with the largest thickness, but regions to obtain the largest bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were unknown. Purpose: To identify the zygomatic regions for placing quad zygomatic implants that obtain the largest BIC. Materials and Methods: The zygomatic thicknesses of 300 zygomata were measured at total 12 points on the superior, middle, and inferior areas on the 3-dimensional reconstruction images. In 50 edentulous maxillae, the zygomatic BICs of virtually placed implants were measured and the incidence of the intrusion into the infratemporal fossa calculated at each point. Results: The largest thickness in the superior, middle, and inferior regions were at Point A1 (8.01 ± 2.10 mm), Point B1 (7.02 ± 1.73 mm), and Point C0 (6.65 ± 1.66 mm), respectively. The virtually placed implants at Point A3 (16.70 ± 4.18 mm) and Point B1 (12.07 ± 3.84 mm) had the highest BICs while retaining the minimum incidence of the intrusion complications. Conclusion: To obtain the largest BICs and avoid the intrusion complications, results suggested that the postero-superior region (Point A3) and the center of zygoma (Point B1) were the optimal places for the placement of quad zygomatic implants.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329455
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.302
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHung, Kuo Feng-
dc.contributor.authorAi, Qi Yong-
dc.contributor.authorFan, Sheng Chi-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yi Qun-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:32:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:32:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2017, v. 19, n. 5, p. 841-848-
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329455-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The zygomatic implant is suggested to be placed in zygomatic areas with the largest thickness, but regions to obtain the largest bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were unknown. Purpose: To identify the zygomatic regions for placing quad zygomatic implants that obtain the largest BIC. Materials and Methods: The zygomatic thicknesses of 300 zygomata were measured at total 12 points on the superior, middle, and inferior areas on the 3-dimensional reconstruction images. In 50 edentulous maxillae, the zygomatic BICs of virtually placed implants were measured and the incidence of the intrusion into the infratemporal fossa calculated at each point. Results: The largest thickness in the superior, middle, and inferior regions were at Point A1 (8.01 ± 2.10 mm), Point B1 (7.02 ± 1.73 mm), and Point C0 (6.65 ± 1.66 mm), respectively. The virtually placed implants at Point A3 (16.70 ± 4.18 mm) and Point B1 (12.07 ± 3.84 mm) had the highest BICs while retaining the minimum incidence of the intrusion complications. Conclusion: To obtain the largest BICs and avoid the intrusion complications, results suggested that the postero-superior region (Point A3) and the center of zygoma (Point B1) were the optimal places for the placement of quad zygomatic implants.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research-
dc.subjectbone-to-implant contact-
dc.subjectedentulous maxilla-
dc.subjectzygomatic implants-
dc.subjectzygomatic thickness-
dc.titleMeasurement of the zygomatic region for the optimal placement of quad zygomatic implants-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.12524-
dc.identifier.pmid28766912-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85026626956-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage841-
dc.identifier.epage848-
dc.identifier.eissn1708-8208-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000412213800009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats