File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.048
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85038843708
- WOS: WOS:000424720200023
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Verification, improvement and application of aerosol optical depths in China Part 1: Inter-comparison of NPP-VIIRS and Aqua-MODIS
Title | Verification, improvement and application of aerosol optical depths in China Part 1: Inter-comparison of NPP-VIIRS and Aqua-MODIS |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | AERONET AOD China MODIS VIIRS |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | Atmospheric Environment, 2018, v. 175, p. 221-233 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The objective of this study is to evaluate typical aerosol optical depth (AOD) products in China, which experienced seriously increasing atmospheric particulate pollution. For this, the Aqua–MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) AOD products (MYD04) at 10 km spatial resolution and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Environmental Data Record (EDR) AOD product at 6 km resolution for different Quality Flags (QF) are obtained for validation against AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) AOD measurements during 2013–2016. Results show that VIIRS EDR similarly Dark Target (DT) and MODIS DT algorithms perform worse with only 45.36% and 45.59% of the retrievals (QF = 3) falling within the Expected Error (EE, ±(0.05 + 15%)) compared to the Deep Blue (DB) algorithm (69.25%, QF ≥ 2). The DT retrievals perform poorly over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) and Yangtze-River-Delta (YRD) regions, which significantly overestimate the AOD observations, but the performance is better over the Pearl-River-Delta (PRD) region than DB retrievals, which seriously under-estimate the AOD loadings. It is not surprising that the DT algorithm performs better over vegetated areas, while the DB algorithm performs better over bright areas mainly depends on the accuracy of surface reflectance estimation over different land use types. In general, the sensitivity of aerosol to apparent reflectance reduces by about 34% with an increasing surface reflectance by 0.01. Moreover, VIIRS EDR and MODIS DT algorithms perform overall better in the winter as 64.53% and 72.22% of the retrievals are within the EE but with less retrievals. However, the DB algorithm performs worst (57.17%) in summer mainly affected by the vegetation growth but there are overall high accuracies with more than 62% of the collections falling within the EE in other three seasons. Results suggest that the quality assurance process can help improve the overall data quality for MYD04 DB retrievals, but it is not always true for VIIRS EDR and MYD04 DT AOD retrievals. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329484 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.169 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wei, Jing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Lin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Bo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bilal, Muhammad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Zhaoyang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Lunche | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-09T03:33:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-09T03:33:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Atmospheric Environment, 2018, v. 175, p. 221-233 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1352-2310 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329484 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study is to evaluate typical aerosol optical depth (AOD) products in China, which experienced seriously increasing atmospheric particulate pollution. For this, the Aqua–MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) AOD products (MYD04) at 10 km spatial resolution and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Environmental Data Record (EDR) AOD product at 6 km resolution for different Quality Flags (QF) are obtained for validation against AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) AOD measurements during 2013–2016. Results show that VIIRS EDR similarly Dark Target (DT) and MODIS DT algorithms perform worse with only 45.36% and 45.59% of the retrievals (QF = 3) falling within the Expected Error (EE, ±(0.05 + 15%)) compared to the Deep Blue (DB) algorithm (69.25%, QF ≥ 2). The DT retrievals perform poorly over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) and Yangtze-River-Delta (YRD) regions, which significantly overestimate the AOD observations, but the performance is better over the Pearl-River-Delta (PRD) region than DB retrievals, which seriously under-estimate the AOD loadings. It is not surprising that the DT algorithm performs better over vegetated areas, while the DB algorithm performs better over bright areas mainly depends on the accuracy of surface reflectance estimation over different land use types. In general, the sensitivity of aerosol to apparent reflectance reduces by about 34% with an increasing surface reflectance by 0.01. Moreover, VIIRS EDR and MODIS DT algorithms perform overall better in the winter as 64.53% and 72.22% of the retrievals are within the EE but with less retrievals. However, the DB algorithm performs worst (57.17%) in summer mainly affected by the vegetation growth but there are overall high accuracies with more than 62% of the collections falling within the EE in other three seasons. Results suggest that the quality assurance process can help improve the overall data quality for MYD04 DB retrievals, but it is not always true for VIIRS EDR and MYD04 DT AOD retrievals. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Atmospheric Environment | - |
dc.subject | AERONET | - |
dc.subject | AOD | - |
dc.subject | China | - |
dc.subject | MODIS | - |
dc.subject | VIIRS | - |
dc.title | Verification, improvement and application of aerosol optical depths in China Part 1: Inter-comparison of NPP-VIIRS and Aqua-MODIS | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.048 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85038843708 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 175 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 221 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 233 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-2844 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000424720200023 | - |