File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Re-understanding of land surface albedo and related terms in satellite-based retrievals

TitleRe-understanding of land surface albedo and related terms in satellite-based retrievals
Authors
KeywordsBRDF
hemispheric reflectance
satellite-based albedo product
Surface albedo
Issue Date2020
Citation
Big Earth Data, 2020, v. 4, n. 1, p. 45-67 How to Cite?
AbstractLand surface albedo is a critical variable in determining surface energy balance, and regulating climate and ecosystem processes through feedback mechanisms. Therefore, climatic modelers and radiative monitoring require accurate estimates of land surface albedo. With the instrument development, algorithm upgrade, spectral-band-adjustment in wavelength center or band width, and the increasing distinct requirement from diversified communities, various albedo terms have been generated in related satellite-based products. The lack of understanding on the divergence of these terminologies can introduce potential considerable errors in the subsequent applications, or an elevated probability to invert the deduced conclusion. We surveyed the basic concepts of reflectance quantities, retrieval strategies, and models developed since the 1970s, and discuss both strength and opportunity for improvements on land surface albedo extraction, and product generation. In addition, we exemplified the difference of albedo terms using the daily MODIS product (MCD43A) to emphasize the potential risk of the ambiguous usage, over typical IGBP land covers in Northern Kazakhstan. Our investigation shows that relative differences among various albedo terms can reach up to 181% and 50%, while 0.266 and 0.118 of  absolute variance respectively in the narrow and broad-band surface albedo, which illuminated cautions against the ambiguous understanding of albedo terminologies or erroneous usage of albedo products.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329642
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.928
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShuai, Yanmin-
dc.contributor.authorTuerhanjiang, Latipa-
dc.contributor.authorShao, Congying-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Yuyu-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Donghui-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Tao-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Ji-
dc.contributor.authorChu, Nan-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:34:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:34:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBig Earth Data, 2020, v. 4, n. 1, p. 45-67-
dc.identifier.issn2096-4471-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329642-
dc.description.abstractLand surface albedo is a critical variable in determining surface energy balance, and regulating climate and ecosystem processes through feedback mechanisms. Therefore, climatic modelers and radiative monitoring require accurate estimates of land surface albedo. With the instrument development, algorithm upgrade, spectral-band-adjustment in wavelength center or band width, and the increasing distinct requirement from diversified communities, various albedo terms have been generated in related satellite-based products. The lack of understanding on the divergence of these terminologies can introduce potential considerable errors in the subsequent applications, or an elevated probability to invert the deduced conclusion. We surveyed the basic concepts of reflectance quantities, retrieval strategies, and models developed since the 1970s, and discuss both strength and opportunity for improvements on land surface albedo extraction, and product generation. In addition, we exemplified the difference of albedo terms using the daily MODIS product (MCD43A) to emphasize the potential risk of the ambiguous usage, over typical IGBP land covers in Northern Kazakhstan. Our investigation shows that relative differences among various albedo terms can reach up to 181% and 50%, while 0.266 and 0.118 of  absolute variance respectively in the narrow and broad-band surface albedo, which illuminated cautions against the ambiguous understanding of albedo terminologies or erroneous usage of albedo products.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBig Earth Data-
dc.subjectBRDF-
dc.subjecthemispheric reflectance-
dc.subjectsatellite-based albedo product-
dc.subjectSurface albedo-
dc.titleRe-understanding of land surface albedo and related terms in satellite-based retrievals-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/20964471.2020.1716561-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85089726424-
dc.identifier.volume4-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage45-
dc.identifier.epage67-
dc.identifier.eissn2574-5417-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000665796300004-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats