File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.15195/V10.A4
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85150473252
- WOS: WOS:000948559100001
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Testing Models of Cognition and Action Using Response Conflict and Multinomial Processing Tree Models
Title | Testing Models of Cognition and Action Using Response Conflict and Multinomial Processing Tree Models |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | action cognition culture and cognition methods multinomial processing tree models response conflict tasks |
Issue Date | 2023 |
Citation | Sociological Science, 2023, v. 10, p. 118-149 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Dual-process perspectives have made substantial contributions to our understanding of behavior, but fundamental questions about how and when deliberate and automatic cognition shape action continue to be debated. Among these are whether automatic or deliberate cognition is ultimately in control of behavior, how often each type of cognition controls behavior in practice, and how the answers to each of these questions depends on the individual in question. To answer these questions, sociologists need methodological tools that enable them to directly test competing claims. We argue that this aim will be advanced by (a) using a particular type of data known as response conflict data and (b) analyzing those data using multinomial processing tree models. We illustrate the utility of this approach by reanalyzing three samples of data from Miles et al. (2019) on behaviors related to politics, morality, and race |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/330296 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Miles, Andrew | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brett, Gordon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Khan, Salwa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Samim, Yagana | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-05T12:09:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-05T12:09:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Sociological Science, 2023, v. 10, p. 118-149 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/330296 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Dual-process perspectives have made substantial contributions to our understanding of behavior, but fundamental questions about how and when deliberate and automatic cognition shape action continue to be debated. Among these are whether automatic or deliberate cognition is ultimately in control of behavior, how often each type of cognition controls behavior in practice, and how the answers to each of these questions depends on the individual in question. To answer these questions, sociologists need methodological tools that enable them to directly test competing claims. We argue that this aim will be advanced by (a) using a particular type of data known as response conflict data and (b) analyzing those data using multinomial processing tree models. We illustrate the utility of this approach by reanalyzing three samples of data from Miles et al. (2019) on behaviors related to politics, morality, and race | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sociological Science | - |
dc.subject | action | - |
dc.subject | cognition | - |
dc.subject | culture and cognition | - |
dc.subject | methods | - |
dc.subject | multinomial processing tree models | - |
dc.subject | response conflict tasks | - |
dc.title | Testing Models of Cognition and Action Using Response Conflict and Multinomial Processing Tree Models | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15195/V10.A4 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85150473252 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 118 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 149 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2330-6696 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000948559100001 | - |