File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Intrinsic connectivity of the prefrontal cortex and striato-limbic system respectively differentiate major depressive from generalized anxiety disorder

TitleIntrinsic connectivity of the prefrontal cortex and striato-limbic system respectively differentiate major depressive from generalized anxiety disorder
Authors
Issue Date2021
Citation
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021, v. 46, n. 4, p. 791-798 How to Cite?
AbstractMajor depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are highly prevalent and debilitating disorders. The high overlap on the symptomatic and neurobiological level led to ongoing debates about their diagnostic and neurobiological uniqueness. The present study aims to identify common and disorder-specific neuropathological mechanisms and treatment targets in MDD and GAD. To this end we combined categorical and dimensional disorder models with a fully data-driven intrinsic network-level analysis (intrinsic connectivity contrast, ICC) to resting-state fMRI data acquired in 108 individuals (n = 35 and n = 38 unmedicated patients with first-episode GAD, MDD, respectively, and n = 35 healthy controls). Convergent evidence from categorical and dimensional analyses revealed MDD-specific decreased whole-brain connectivity profiles of the medial prefrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while GAD was specifically characterized by decreased whole-brain connectivity profiles of the putamen and decreased communication of this region with the amygdala. Together, findings from the present data-driven analysis suggest that intrinsic communication of frontal regions engaged in executive functions and emotion regulation represent depression-specific neurofunctional markers and treatment targets whereas dysregulated intrinsic communication of the striato-amygdala system engaged in reinforcement-based and emotional learning processes represent GAD-specific markers.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330662
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.743
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXu, Xiaolei-
dc.contributor.authorDai, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yuanshu-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Congcong-
dc.contributor.authorXin, Fei-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Xinqi-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorStamatakis, Emmanuel A.-
dc.contributor.authorYao, Shuxia-
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Lizhu-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yulan-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jinyu-
dc.contributor.authorZou, Zhili-
dc.contributor.authorVatansever, Deniz-
dc.contributor.authorKendrick, Keith M.-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Bo-
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Benjamin-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T12:12:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-05T12:12:53Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationNeuropsychopharmacology, 2021, v. 46, n. 4, p. 791-798-
dc.identifier.issn0893-133X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330662-
dc.description.abstractMajor depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are highly prevalent and debilitating disorders. The high overlap on the symptomatic and neurobiological level led to ongoing debates about their diagnostic and neurobiological uniqueness. The present study aims to identify common and disorder-specific neuropathological mechanisms and treatment targets in MDD and GAD. To this end we combined categorical and dimensional disorder models with a fully data-driven intrinsic network-level analysis (intrinsic connectivity contrast, ICC) to resting-state fMRI data acquired in 108 individuals (n = 35 and n = 38 unmedicated patients with first-episode GAD, MDD, respectively, and n = 35 healthy controls). Convergent evidence from categorical and dimensional analyses revealed MDD-specific decreased whole-brain connectivity profiles of the medial prefrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while GAD was specifically characterized by decreased whole-brain connectivity profiles of the putamen and decreased communication of this region with the amygdala. Together, findings from the present data-driven analysis suggest that intrinsic communication of frontal regions engaged in executive functions and emotion regulation represent depression-specific neurofunctional markers and treatment targets whereas dysregulated intrinsic communication of the striato-amygdala system engaged in reinforcement-based and emotional learning processes represent GAD-specific markers.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuropsychopharmacology-
dc.titleIntrinsic connectivity of the prefrontal cortex and striato-limbic system respectively differentiate major depressive from generalized anxiety disorder-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41386-020-00868-5-
dc.identifier.pmid32961541-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85091305282-
dc.identifier.volume46-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage791-
dc.identifier.epage798-
dc.identifier.eissn1740-634X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000575748200001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats