File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Prostate health index can stratify patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging to reduce prostate biopsies

TitleProstate health index can stratify patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging to reduce prostate biopsies
Authors
Issue Date22-Aug-2023
PublisherMedknow Publications
Citation
Asian Journal of Andrology, 2023 How to Cite?
Abstract

We aim to evaluate prostate health index as an additional risk-stratification tool in patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Men with biochemical or clinical suspicion of having prostate cancer who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in two tertiary centers (Queen Mary Hospital and Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China) between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsies were performed after prostate health index testing. Those who only had Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions were further stratified into four prostate health index risk groups and the cancer detection rates were analyzed. Out of the 747 patients, 47.3% had Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions only. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in this group was 15.0%. The cancer detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer had statistically significant differences: 5.3% in prostate health index <25.0, 7.4% in prostate health index 25.0–34.9, 17.9% in prostate health index 35.0–54.9, and 52.6% in prostate health index ≥55.0 (P < 0.01). Among the patients, 26.9% could have avoided a biopsy with a prostate health index <25.0, at the expense of a 5.3% risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer. Prostate health index could be used as an additional risk stratification tool for patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions. Biopsies could be avoided in patients with low prostate health index, with a small risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331621
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.689

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, John Shung-Lai-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Wai-Kit-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Brian Sze-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Stacia Tsun-Tsun-
dc.contributor.authorNa, Rong-
dc.contributor.authorZhan, Yongle-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Chi-Yuen-
dc.contributor.authorIp, Chi-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ada Tsui-Lin-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Yiu-Chung-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:57:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:57:26Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-22-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Journal of Andrology, 2023-
dc.identifier.issn1008-682X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331621-
dc.description.abstract<p>We aim to evaluate prostate health index as an additional risk-stratification tool in patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Men with biochemical or clinical suspicion of having prostate cancer who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in two tertiary centers (Queen Mary Hospital and Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China) between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsies were performed after prostate health index testing. Those who only had Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions were further stratified into four prostate health index risk groups and the cancer detection rates were analyzed. Out of the 747 patients, 47.3% had Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions only. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in this group was 15.0%. The cancer detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer had statistically significant differences: 5.3% in prostate health index <25.0, 7.4% in prostate health index 25.0–34.9, 17.9% in prostate health index 35.0–54.9, and 52.6% in prostate health index ≥55.0 (<em>P</em> < 0.01). Among the patients, 26.9% could have avoided a biopsy with a prostate health index <25.0, at the expense of a 5.3% risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer. Prostate health index could be used as an additional risk stratification tool for patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions. Biopsies could be avoided in patients with low prostate health index, with a small risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMedknow Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Journal of Andrology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleProstate health index can stratify patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging to reduce prostate biopsies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/aja202332-
dc.identifier.eissn1745-7262-
dc.identifier.issnl1008-682X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats