File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00130S
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85167674764
- WOS: WOS:001012924700001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Carvedilol Versus Other Nonselective Beta Blockers for Variceal Bleeding Prophylaxis and Death: A Network Meta-analysis
Title | Carvedilol Versus Other Nonselective Beta Blockers for Variceal Bleeding Prophylaxis and Death: A Network Meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Carvedilol Cirrhosis CPSH Nadolol NSBB Propranolol Varices |
Issue Date | 8-Jun-2023 |
Publisher | XIA & HE Publishing Inc. |
Citation | Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology, 2023, v. 11, n. 5, p. 1143-1149 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background and aims: We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis (NWM) to examine comparative effectiveness of non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) on prophylaxis of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GVB) and mortality benefit. Methods: MEDLINE (OVID) and EMBASE databases were searched for eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 3, 2021. Outcomes of interest included primary/secondary prophylaxis of GVB, failure to achieve hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) decremental response, liver-related and all-cause mortality. A Bayesian NWM was performed to derive relative risk (RR) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The ranking probability of each NSBB was assessed by surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: Thirty-three RCTs including 3,188 cirrhosis patients with gastroesophageal varices were included. Compared with placebo, nadolol ranked first for reducing variceal bleeding [RR:0.25, (95% CrI:0.11-0.51); SUCRA:0.898], followed by carvedilol [RR:0.33, (95% CrI: 0.11-0.88); SUCRA:0.692] and propranolol [RR:0.52, (95% CrI:0.37-0.75); SUCRA:0.405]. Carvedilol was more effective than propranolol in achieving HVPG decremental response [RR:0.43, (95% CrI: 0.26-0.69)]. Carvedilol ranked first for reducing all-cause mortality [RR: 0.32, (95% CrI:0.17-0.57); SUCRA:0.963), followed by nadolol [RR:0.48, (95% CI:0.29-0.77); SUCRA:0.688], and propranolol [RR:0.77, (95% CI:0.58-1.02); SUCRA: 0.337]. Similar findings were observed for liver-related mortality. Carvedilol ranked the safest. The RR of adverse events was 4.38, (95% CrI:0.33-161.4); SUCRA:0.530, followed by propranolol [RR: 7.54, (95% CrI:1.90-47.89); SUCRA:0.360], and nadolol [RR: 18.24, (95% CrI:91.51-390.90); SUCRA:0.158]. Conclusions: Carvedilol is the preferred NSBB with better survival benefit and lower occurrence of adverse events among patients with gastroesophageal varices. Keywords: CPSH; Carvedilol; Cirrhosis; NSBB; Nadolol; Propranolol; Varices. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/331826 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.988 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, KS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mok, CH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, LK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mao, XH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mak, LY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seto, WK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yuen, MF | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-21T06:59:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-21T06:59:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology, 2023, v. 11, n. 5, p. 1143-1149 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2225-0719 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/331826 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis (NWM) to examine comparative effectiveness of non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) on prophylaxis of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GVB) and mortality benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (OVID) and EMBASE databases were searched for eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 3, 2021. Outcomes of interest included primary/secondary prophylaxis of GVB, failure to achieve hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) decremental response, liver-related and all-cause mortality. A Bayesian NWM was performed to derive relative risk (RR) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The ranking probability of each NSBB was assessed by surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three RCTs including 3,188 cirrhosis patients with gastroesophageal varices were included. Compared with placebo, nadolol ranked first for reducing variceal bleeding [RR:0.25, (95% CrI:0.11-0.51); SUCRA:0.898], followed by carvedilol [RR:0.33, (95% CrI: 0.11-0.88); SUCRA:0.692] and propranolol [RR:0.52, (95% CrI:0.37-0.75); SUCRA:0.405]. Carvedilol was more effective than propranolol in achieving HVPG decremental response [RR:0.43, (95% CrI: 0.26-0.69)]. Carvedilol ranked first for reducing all-cause mortality [RR: 0.32, (95% CrI:0.17-0.57); SUCRA:0.963), followed by nadolol [RR:0.48, (95% CI:0.29-0.77); SUCRA:0.688], and propranolol [RR:0.77, (95% CI:0.58-1.02); SUCRA: 0.337]. Similar findings were observed for liver-related mortality. Carvedilol ranked the safest. The RR of adverse events was 4.38, (95% CrI:0.33-161.4); SUCRA:0.530, followed by propranolol [RR: 7.54, (95% CrI:1.90-47.89); SUCRA:0.360], and nadolol [RR: 18.24, (95% CrI:91.51-390.90); SUCRA:0.158].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carvedilol is the preferred NSBB with better survival benefit and lower occurrence of adverse events among patients with gastroesophageal varices.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>CPSH; Carvedilol; Cirrhosis; NSBB; Nadolol; Propranolol; Varices.</p><p><br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | XIA & HE Publishing Inc. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Carvedilol | - |
dc.subject | Cirrhosis | - |
dc.subject | CPSH | - |
dc.subject | Nadolol | - |
dc.subject | NSBB | - |
dc.subject | Propranolol | - |
dc.subject | Varices | - |
dc.title | Carvedilol Versus Other Nonselective Beta Blockers for Variceal Bleeding Prophylaxis and Death: A Network Meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00130S | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85167674764 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1143 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1149 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001012924700001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2225-0719 | - |