File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A regional construction R&D evaluation system for China

TitleA regional construction R&D evaluation system for China
Authors
KeywordsChina
Construction industry
Factor analysis
Research and development
Issue Date2010
Citation
Construction Management and Economics, 2010, v. 28, n. 12, p. 1287-1300 How to Cite?
AbstractFaculty of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China Expenditure on R&D in China's construction industry has been relatively low in comparison with many developed countries for a number of years-a situation considered to be a major barrier to the industry's competitiveness in general and unsatisfactory as regards industry development of the 31 regions involved. A major problem with this is the lack of a sufficiently sophisticated method of objectively evaluating R&D activity in what are quite complex circumstances considering the size and regional differences that exist in this part of the world. A regional construction R&D evaluation system (RCRES) is presented, aimed at rectifying the situation. This is based on 12 indicators drawn from the Chinese Government's R&D Inventory of Resources in consultation with a small group of experts in the field, and further factor analysed into three groups. From this, the required evaluation is obtained by a simple formula. Examination of the results provides a ranking list of the R&D performance of each of the 31 regions, indicating a general disproportion between coastal and inland regions and highlighting regions receiving special emphasis or currently lacking in development. The understanding on this is vital for the future of China's construction industry. © 2010 Taylor & Francis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/332929
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.874
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoling-
dc.contributor.authorSkitmore, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yuzhe-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Kunhui-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:15:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:15:26Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationConstruction Management and Economics, 2010, v. 28, n. 12, p. 1287-1300-
dc.identifier.issn0144-6193-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/332929-
dc.description.abstractFaculty of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China Expenditure on R&D in China's construction industry has been relatively low in comparison with many developed countries for a number of years-a situation considered to be a major barrier to the industry's competitiveness in general and unsatisfactory as regards industry development of the 31 regions involved. A major problem with this is the lack of a sufficiently sophisticated method of objectively evaluating R&D activity in what are quite complex circumstances considering the size and regional differences that exist in this part of the world. A regional construction R&D evaluation system (RCRES) is presented, aimed at rectifying the situation. This is based on 12 indicators drawn from the Chinese Government's R&D Inventory of Resources in consultation with a small group of experts in the field, and further factor analysed into three groups. From this, the required evaluation is obtained by a simple formula. Examination of the results provides a ranking list of the R&D performance of each of the 31 regions, indicating a general disproportion between coastal and inland regions and highlighting regions receiving special emphasis or currently lacking in development. The understanding on this is vital for the future of China's construction industry. © 2010 Taylor & Francis.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofConstruction Management and Economics-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectConstruction industry-
dc.subjectFactor analysis-
dc.subjectResearch and development-
dc.titleA regional construction R&D evaluation system for China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01446193.2010.508501-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-78650236716-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spage1287-
dc.identifier.epage1300-
dc.identifier.eissn1466-433X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000213295000007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats