File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Urban growth dilemmas and solutions in China: Looking forward to 2030

TitleUrban growth dilemmas and solutions in China: Looking forward to 2030
Authors
KeywordsAffordable housing
Industrial land
Land finance
Land finance regime
New-type urbanization
Property tax
Sustainable development
Issue Date2016
Citation
Habitat International, 2016, v. 56, p. 42-51 How to Cite?
AbstractChina's urbanization and industrialization process is replacing large amounts of farmland, which is strongly driven by the country's land finance regime, with the intensified regional/local competition for manufacturing investment opportunities pushing local governments to expropriate farmland at low prices while leasing land at high market value to property developers. The additional revenue obtained in this way, termed financial increment in land value, can drive local economic growth and provide associated infrastructure and other public services. At the same time, however, a floating population of large numbers of inadequately compensated land-lost farmers, although unable to become citizens, have to migrate into urban areas for work, causing overheated employment and housing markets, with rocketing unaffordable housing prices. This, together with various micro factors relating to the party/state's promotion/evaluation system, plays an essential role leading to serious economic, environment and social consequences, e.g., for migrant welfare, the displacement of peasants and loss of land resources, in need of immediate attention.Our question, therefore, is whether such type of urbanization is sustainable. What are the mechanisms behind China's phenomenal urbanization process? From the perspective of institutionalism, this paper investigates the institutional background of the urban growth dilemma and solutions in urban China by introducing an inter-regional game theoretical framework to indicate why the present urbanization pattern is unsustainable. Looking forward to 2030, major policy changes are made from the triple consideration of the floating population, social security and urban environmental pressures. This involves (1) changing the land increment based finance regime into a land stock finance system, (2) the citizenization of migrant workers with affordable housing and (3) creating a more enlightened local government officer appraisal system to better take into account societal issues such as welfare and beyond.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333174
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.205
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.542
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yuzhe-
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jiaojiao-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoling-
dc.contributor.authorSkitmore, Martin-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:17:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:17:17Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationHabitat International, 2016, v. 56, p. 42-51-
dc.identifier.issn0197-3975-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333174-
dc.description.abstractChina's urbanization and industrialization process is replacing large amounts of farmland, which is strongly driven by the country's land finance regime, with the intensified regional/local competition for manufacturing investment opportunities pushing local governments to expropriate farmland at low prices while leasing land at high market value to property developers. The additional revenue obtained in this way, termed financial increment in land value, can drive local economic growth and provide associated infrastructure and other public services. At the same time, however, a floating population of large numbers of inadequately compensated land-lost farmers, although unable to become citizens, have to migrate into urban areas for work, causing overheated employment and housing markets, with rocketing unaffordable housing prices. This, together with various micro factors relating to the party/state's promotion/evaluation system, plays an essential role leading to serious economic, environment and social consequences, e.g., for migrant welfare, the displacement of peasants and loss of land resources, in need of immediate attention.Our question, therefore, is whether such type of urbanization is sustainable. What are the mechanisms behind China's phenomenal urbanization process? From the perspective of institutionalism, this paper investigates the institutional background of the urban growth dilemma and solutions in urban China by introducing an inter-regional game theoretical framework to indicate why the present urbanization pattern is unsustainable. Looking forward to 2030, major policy changes are made from the triple consideration of the floating population, social security and urban environmental pressures. This involves (1) changing the land increment based finance regime into a land stock finance system, (2) the citizenization of migrant workers with affordable housing and (3) creating a more enlightened local government officer appraisal system to better take into account societal issues such as welfare and beyond.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHabitat International-
dc.subjectAffordable housing-
dc.subjectIndustrial land-
dc.subjectLand finance-
dc.subjectLand finance regime-
dc.subjectNew-type urbanization-
dc.subjectProperty tax-
dc.subjectSustainable development-
dc.titleUrban growth dilemmas and solutions in China: Looking forward to 2030-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.04.004-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84964546774-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.spage42-
dc.identifier.epage51-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000379887000005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats