File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.043
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85038845556
- WOS: WOS:000430761100006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Land use policy as an instrument of rural resilience – The case of land withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads in China
Title | Land use policy as an instrument of rural resilience – The case of land withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads in China |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Assessment index Government regulations Land market Rural development Rural sustainability |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | Ecological Indicators, 2018, v. 87, p. 47-55 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Resilience has emerged as an attractive conceptual approach for theorizing rural development in terms of highly complex, vulnerable and adaptive systems. In China, land use policies have evidently influenced rural resilience. We conduct a co-citation analysis, especially the visualization of co-citation networks and research clusters, using CiteSpace 4.0.R5. Based on the analysis and literature review, we develop an assessment index system comprising four types of resilience – engineering, ecological, economic and social – to evaluate the changes in rural resilience resulting from a policy to develop a withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads (WMRH). Our findings indicate that rural resilience in Guangzhou, Chongqing and Wuxi, selected as the study areas, increased by 123%, 61% and 88% respectively after the implementation of the policy. The main causes of these variations in changes in rural resilience are attributed to the diverse economic development modes in the different regions, as well as differing degrees of land market development and government regulation. Overall, the implementation of a WMRH, accompanied by a strong market and government regulation, is found to be optimal for enhancing rural resilience. We conclude that improving rural resilience involves appropriate government regulations as well as simply paying attention to the effects of the market on the optimal allocation of resources. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/333307 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.633 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Xianjin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Huan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Xiaoling | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Xin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-06T05:18:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-06T05:18:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecological Indicators, 2018, v. 87, p. 47-55 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-160X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/333307 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Resilience has emerged as an attractive conceptual approach for theorizing rural development in terms of highly complex, vulnerable and adaptive systems. In China, land use policies have evidently influenced rural resilience. We conduct a co-citation analysis, especially the visualization of co-citation networks and research clusters, using CiteSpace 4.0.R5. Based on the analysis and literature review, we develop an assessment index system comprising four types of resilience – engineering, ecological, economic and social – to evaluate the changes in rural resilience resulting from a policy to develop a withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads (WMRH). Our findings indicate that rural resilience in Guangzhou, Chongqing and Wuxi, selected as the study areas, increased by 123%, 61% and 88% respectively after the implementation of the policy. The main causes of these variations in changes in rural resilience are attributed to the diverse economic development modes in the different regions, as well as differing degrees of land market development and government regulation. Overall, the implementation of a WMRH, accompanied by a strong market and government regulation, is found to be optimal for enhancing rural resilience. We conclude that improving rural resilience involves appropriate government regulations as well as simply paying attention to the effects of the market on the optimal allocation of resources. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ecological Indicators | - |
dc.subject | Assessment index | - |
dc.subject | Government regulations | - |
dc.subject | Land market | - |
dc.subject | Rural development | - |
dc.subject | Rural sustainability | - |
dc.title | Land use policy as an instrument of rural resilience – The case of land withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads in China | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.043 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85038845556 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 87 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 47 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 55 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000430761100006 | - |