File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story

TitleEmissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story
Authors
KeywordsChina'S emissions trading system pilots
Collaborative governance
Difference-in-differences (DID) method
Haze pollution
Issue Date2020
Citation
Energy Policy, 2020, v. 138, article no. 111282 How to Cite?
AbstractThe study aims to employ the difference-in-differences method and mediating effect model to assess panel data of 267 prefectural-level cities in Chinese 30 provinces from 2003 to 2016 and empirically examines whether the Emissions Trading System pilot has realized collaborative governance effects upon air pollution. This study verifies the rationality of the element design of China's Emissions Trading System pilot from the perspective of environmental effects. The results indicate that the China's Emissions Trading System pilot does have a significant ‘reduction effect’ on haze pollution concentration level, which is probably achieved by ‘boosting the application and transformation of green technologies among enterprises’ and ‘transferring heavily polluted industries’. Moreover, the total quota allocation, total number of incorporated enterprises and the entry of institutional and individual investors were not the significant influencing factors for reducing haze pollution, while the transaction volume of China Certified Emission Reduction and the total penalty amounts incurred play significant roles. The heterogeneity test shows that only Guangdong province's policy has a significantly negative effect on haze pollution concentration. This study provides a new way of thinking for the coordinated governance mode by combining environmental governance and carbon trading scheme. The experiential evidence strongly supports the establishment and improvement of China's Emissions Trading System pilots and the implementation of a unified national carbon market.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333408
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.576
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.093
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYan, Yaxue-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoling-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jihong-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Kai-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:19:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:19:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Policy, 2020, v. 138, article no. 111282-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333408-
dc.description.abstractThe study aims to employ the difference-in-differences method and mediating effect model to assess panel data of 267 prefectural-level cities in Chinese 30 provinces from 2003 to 2016 and empirically examines whether the Emissions Trading System pilot has realized collaborative governance effects upon air pollution. This study verifies the rationality of the element design of China's Emissions Trading System pilot from the perspective of environmental effects. The results indicate that the China's Emissions Trading System pilot does have a significant ‘reduction effect’ on haze pollution concentration level, which is probably achieved by ‘boosting the application and transformation of green technologies among enterprises’ and ‘transferring heavily polluted industries’. Moreover, the total quota allocation, total number of incorporated enterprises and the entry of institutional and individual investors were not the significant influencing factors for reducing haze pollution, while the transaction volume of China Certified Emission Reduction and the total penalty amounts incurred play significant roles. The heterogeneity test shows that only Guangdong province's policy has a significantly negative effect on haze pollution concentration. This study provides a new way of thinking for the coordinated governance mode by combining environmental governance and carbon trading scheme. The experiential evidence strongly supports the establishment and improvement of China's Emissions Trading System pilots and the implementation of a unified national carbon market.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Policy-
dc.subjectChina'S emissions trading system pilots-
dc.subjectCollaborative governance-
dc.subjectDifference-in-differences (DID) method-
dc.subjectHaze pollution-
dc.titleEmissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111282-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85078219487-
dc.identifier.volume138-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 111282-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 111282-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000526116500025-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats