File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The effect on poverty alleviation and income increase of rural land consolidation in different models: A China study

TitleThe effect on poverty alleviation and income increase of rural land consolidation in different models: A China study
Authors
KeywordsGovernment-led model
Poverty alleviation
PPP model
Rural land consolidation
Sustainable livelihood framework
Issue Date2020
Citation
Land Use Policy, 2020, v. 99, article no. 104989 How to Cite?
AbstractChina has been faced with many issues in land use due to its rapid industrialization and urbanization, and socio-economic transformation. This has hindered the coupling of “human-land-industry” systems and restricted the sustainable development of poor areas. Rural Land Consolidation (RLC), in combination with land system reform and policy innovation, which has produced the sustainable use of land, and further emerged as one of the most important instruments to boost China's poverty alleviation. This paper employs a sustainable livelihood framework to investigate the poverty alleviation and income increase mechanisms of different RLC models. Based on a questionnaire survey of 877 households in Hubei and Guizhou Province, the PSM-DID model of quasi-experimental research is applied to examine how different RLC models (i.e. government-led and PPP) affect the total income and income components (i.e. agricultural, property, wage, and other incomes) of poor and non-poor households. The results show that RLC promotes the coupling of “human-land-industry” systems in poverty-stricken areas during the transformation process by combining with land system reform and policy innovation. This has helped reduce the vulnerability of farmer households’ livelihood and encourages them to obtain sustainable livelihood resources, contributes to alleviating poverty, and thus increases income. However, poverty alleviation and income increase are not consistent across different models. The theoretical analysis is verified by empirical research, which shows that two RLC models can promote the income growth of poor and non-poor households sustainably. It also demonstrates that the income-increasing effect of non-poor households is much higher than poor households, as well as indicating that the PPP model has a much higher income-increasing effect on households than government-led counterparts. These findings establish a basis for corresponding policy recommendations, which are put forward with the intention of improving RLC's efficiency in alleviating poverty and increasing incomes, and providing an important reference for other developing countries to formulate associated policies for RLC and poverty alleviation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333458
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.847
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Dongli-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Wenxiong-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoling-
dc.contributor.authorZuo, Jian-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:19:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:19:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy, 2020, v. 99, article no. 104989-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333458-
dc.description.abstractChina has been faced with many issues in land use due to its rapid industrialization and urbanization, and socio-economic transformation. This has hindered the coupling of “human-land-industry” systems and restricted the sustainable development of poor areas. Rural Land Consolidation (RLC), in combination with land system reform and policy innovation, which has produced the sustainable use of land, and further emerged as one of the most important instruments to boost China's poverty alleviation. This paper employs a sustainable livelihood framework to investigate the poverty alleviation and income increase mechanisms of different RLC models. Based on a questionnaire survey of 877 households in Hubei and Guizhou Province, the PSM-DID model of quasi-experimental research is applied to examine how different RLC models (i.e. government-led and PPP) affect the total income and income components (i.e. agricultural, property, wage, and other incomes) of poor and non-poor households. The results show that RLC promotes the coupling of “human-land-industry” systems in poverty-stricken areas during the transformation process by combining with land system reform and policy innovation. This has helped reduce the vulnerability of farmer households’ livelihood and encourages them to obtain sustainable livelihood resources, contributes to alleviating poverty, and thus increases income. However, poverty alleviation and income increase are not consistent across different models. The theoretical analysis is verified by empirical research, which shows that two RLC models can promote the income growth of poor and non-poor households sustainably. It also demonstrates that the income-increasing effect of non-poor households is much higher than poor households, as well as indicating that the PPP model has a much higher income-increasing effect on households than government-led counterparts. These findings establish a basis for corresponding policy recommendations, which are put forward with the intention of improving RLC's efficiency in alleviating poverty and increasing incomes, and providing an important reference for other developing countries to formulate associated policies for RLC and poverty alleviation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLand Use Policy-
dc.subjectGovernment-led model-
dc.subjectPoverty alleviation-
dc.subjectPPP model-
dc.subjectRural land consolidation-
dc.subjectSustainable livelihood framework-
dc.titleThe effect on poverty alleviation and income increase of rural land consolidation in different models: A China study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104989-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85089362193-
dc.identifier.volume99-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104989-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104989-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000594488300002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats