File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Dissecting the illegal pangolin trade in China: An insight from seizures data reports

TitleDissecting the illegal pangolin trade in China: An insight from seizures data reports
Authors
KeywordsConservation
ethnomedicine
exploitation
insurance cover
interception
wildlife crime
Issue Date14-Jan-2022
PublisherPensoft Publishers
Citation
Nature Conservation, 2022, v. 46, p. 17-38 How to Cite?
Abstract

Wildlife trafficking poses a major threat to global biodiversity. Species such as pangolins are particularly vulnerable and trade continues almost unabated despite numerous interventions aimed at eradicating illegal wildlife trade. Despite restrictions on the pangolin trade, thousands of pangolins continue to be intercepted annually. We focused on China because of the recent delisting of pangolins from the Chinese pharmacopeia, and their removal from healthcare insurance, despite deeply ingrained traditions of having pangolins for ethno-medicinal use. We collated pangolin interception data from public online media seizure reports to characterize the pangolin trade within China, and found that a total of 326 independent seizures equivalent to 143,130 pangolins (31,676 individuals and 222,908 kg of scale) were reported in 26 provinces. Pangolin domestic seizures are greatest in the southern cities of Dehong, Fangchenggang, and Guangzhou. Also, we found 17 countries within the global pangolins range which were the major source of the pangolin shipments to China. The number of arrests and convictions was much lower than the number of pangolin incidents reported. Our results show a significant increase in the volume of scales and number of live pangolin seizures after amended endangered species law came into effect in 2018, and recorded the highest number of individual pangolin interceptions. China has shown increasing wildlife seizures over time, owing partly to emergent trends in the international wildlife trade as well as increasing global demand for ethnomedicine. The future eradication of illegal wildlife trade in China is dependent not only on stringent border control and offender prosecution but also the; removal of other threatened species from the pharmacopeia and healthcare insurance which includes wildlife derivatives. Furthermore, our work highlights importance of current policy intervention to combat the pangolin trade within China, and the need for further interventions both within China and in export countries.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333803
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.431
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.642

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOmifolaji, J-
dc.contributor.authorHughes, A-
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, A-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, J-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, S-
dc.contributor.authorIkyaagba, E-
dc.contributor.authorLuan, X-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T08:39:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T08:39:12Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-14-
dc.identifier.citationNature Conservation, 2022, v. 46, p. 17-38-
dc.identifier.issn1314-6947-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333803-
dc.description.abstract<p>Wildlife trafficking poses a major threat to global biodiversity. Species such as pangolins are particularly vulnerable and trade continues almost unabated despite numerous interventions aimed at eradicating illegal wildlife trade. Despite restrictions on the pangolin trade, thousands of pangolins continue to be intercepted annually. We focused on China because of the recent delisting of pangolins from the Chinese pharmacopeia, and their removal from healthcare insurance, despite deeply ingrained traditions of having pangolins for ethno-medicinal use. We collated pangolin interception data from public online media seizure reports to characterize the pangolin trade within China, and found that a total of 326 independent seizures equivalent to 143,130 pangolins (31,676 individuals and 222,908 kg of scale) were reported in 26 provinces. Pangolin domestic seizures are greatest in the southern cities of Dehong, Fangchenggang, and Guangzhou. Also, we found 17 countries within the global pangolins range which were the major source of the pangolin shipments to China. The number of arrests and convictions was much lower than the number of pangolin incidents reported. Our results show a significant increase in the volume of scales and number of live pangolin seizures after amended endangered species law came into effect in 2018, and recorded the highest number of individual pangolin interceptions. China has shown increasing wildlife seizures over time, owing partly to emergent trends in the international wildlife trade as well as increasing global demand for ethnomedicine. The future eradication of illegal wildlife trade in China is dependent not only on stringent border control and offender prosecution but also the; removal of other threatened species from the pharmacopeia and healthcare insurance which includes wildlife derivatives. Furthermore, our work highlights importance of current policy intervention to combat the pangolin trade within China, and the need for further interventions both within China and in export countries.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPensoft Publishers-
dc.relation.ispartofNature Conservation-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectConservation-
dc.subjectethnomedicine-
dc.subjectexploitation-
dc.subjectinsurance cover-
dc.subjectinterception-
dc.subjectwildlife crime-
dc.titleDissecting the illegal pangolin trade in China: An insight from seizures data reports-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/natureconservation.45.57962-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85126571435-
dc.identifier.volume46-
dc.identifier.spage17-
dc.identifier.epage38-
dc.identifier.eissn1314-3301-
dc.identifier.issnl1314-3301-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats