File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.001
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84947046367
- WOS: WOS:000365369600014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Four system boundaries for carbon accounts
Title | Four system boundaries for carbon accounts |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Carbon emissions Carbon footprint China Consumption-based emission Embodied emissions Multi-regional input-output analysis |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | Ecological Modelling, 2015, v. 318, p. 118-125 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Knowing the carbon emission baseline of a region is a precondition for any mitigation effort, but the baselines are highly dependent on the system boundaries for which they are calculated. On the basis of sectoral energy statistics and a nested provincial and global multi-regional input-output model, we calculate and compare four different system boundaries for China's 30 provinces and major cities. The results demonstrate significant differences in the level of emissions for the different system boundaries. Moreover, the associated emissions with each system boundary varies with the regional development level, i.e. richer areas outsource more emissions to other areas, or in other words boundary 4 emissions are higher than boundary 1 emissions for rich areas and vice versa for poor areas. Given these significant differences it is important to be aware of the implications the choice of an accounting system might have on outcomes. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334409 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.824 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Zhu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Feng, Kuishuang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hubacek, Klaus | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liang, Sai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Anadon, Laura Diaz | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Chao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guan, Dabo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-20T06:47:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-20T06:47:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecological Modelling, 2015, v. 318, p. 118-125 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0304-3800 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334409 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Knowing the carbon emission baseline of a region is a precondition for any mitigation effort, but the baselines are highly dependent on the system boundaries for which they are calculated. On the basis of sectoral energy statistics and a nested provincial and global multi-regional input-output model, we calculate and compare four different system boundaries for China's 30 provinces and major cities. The results demonstrate significant differences in the level of emissions for the different system boundaries. Moreover, the associated emissions with each system boundary varies with the regional development level, i.e. richer areas outsource more emissions to other areas, or in other words boundary 4 emissions are higher than boundary 1 emissions for rich areas and vice versa for poor areas. Given these significant differences it is important to be aware of the implications the choice of an accounting system might have on outcomes. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ecological Modelling | - |
dc.subject | Carbon emissions | - |
dc.subject | Carbon footprint | - |
dc.subject | China | - |
dc.subject | Consumption-based emission | - |
dc.subject | Embodied emissions | - |
dc.subject | Multi-regional input-output analysis | - |
dc.title | Four system boundaries for carbon accounts | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84947046367 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 318 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 118 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 125 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000365369600014 | - |