File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: PROBABILITY FOR EPISTEMIC MODALITIES
Title | PROBABILITY FOR EPISTEMIC MODALITIES |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Citation | Philosophers Imprint, 2021, v. 21, article no. 33 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper develops an information-sensitive theory of the semantics and probability of conditionals and statements involving epistemic modals. The theory validates a number of principles linking probability and modality, including the principle that the probability of a conditional If A, then C equals the probability of C, updated with A. The theory avoids so-called triviality results, which are standardly taken to show that principles of this sort cannot be validated. To achieve this, we deny that rational agents update their credences via conditionalization. We offer a new rule of update, Hyperconditionalization, which agrees with Conditionalization whenever nonmodal statements are at stake but differs for modal and conditional sentences. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/336305 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Goldstein, Simon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Santorio, Paolo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-15T08:25:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-15T08:25:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Philosophers Imprint, 2021, v. 21, article no. 33 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/336305 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper develops an information-sensitive theory of the semantics and probability of conditionals and statements involving epistemic modals. The theory validates a number of principles linking probability and modality, including the principle that the probability of a conditional If A, then C equals the probability of C, updated with A. The theory avoids so-called triviality results, which are standardly taken to show that principles of this sort cannot be validated. To achieve this, we deny that rational agents update their credences via conditionalization. We offer a new rule of update, Hyperconditionalization, which agrees with Conditionalization whenever nonmodal statements are at stake but differs for modal and conditional sentences. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophers Imprint | - |
dc.title | PROBABILITY FOR EPISTEMIC MODALITIES | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85123508032 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 33 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 33 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1533-628X | - |