File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Who Cares for Older Adults? A Cross-National Study of Care Sources for Older Adults With Functional Limitations and Associated Determinants

TitleWho Cares for Older Adults? A Cross-National Study of Care Sources for Older Adults With Functional Limitations and Associated Determinants
Authors
Keywordscross-national study
latent class analysis
long-term services and supports
source of care
Issue Date2024
Citation
Journal of Applied Gerontology, 2024 How to Cite?
AbstractThe study compared care source typologies for older adults in China and the United States. Data from the 2014 U.S. Health and Retirement Study and the 2013 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were used. The respondents included community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older with at least one limitation in activities of daily living (ADLs) or instrumental ADLs (IADLs) (N China = 2476, N US = 2898). Respondents reported whether they received assistance from spouse, child/grandchild, relatives, others, and formal helpers. Latent class analysis and multinomial logistic regression were applied. Four classes were identified in China and the U.S, separately. In both countries, ADLs and IADLs were strong determinants of care source typologies. Care sources were more diverse and included formal assistance among older Americans. Older Chinese relied largely on their spouses and children/grandchildren for support. Policy efforts are needed to expand formal long-term services and supports, particularly in China.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336972
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.977
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKong, Dexia-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Peiyi-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Bei-
dc.contributor.authorDavitt, Joan K.-
dc.contributor.authorShelley, Mack-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-29T06:57:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-29T06:57:48Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Gerontology, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0733-4648-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336972-
dc.description.abstractThe study compared care source typologies for older adults in China and the United States. Data from the 2014 U.S. Health and Retirement Study and the 2013 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were used. The respondents included community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older with at least one limitation in activities of daily living (ADLs) or instrumental ADLs (IADLs) (N China = 2476, N US = 2898). Respondents reported whether they received assistance from spouse, child/grandchild, relatives, others, and formal helpers. Latent class analysis and multinomial logistic regression were applied. Four classes were identified in China and the U.S, separately. In both countries, ADLs and IADLs were strong determinants of care source typologies. Care sources were more diverse and included formal assistance among older Americans. Older Chinese relied largely on their spouses and children/grandchildren for support. Policy efforts are needed to expand formal long-term services and supports, particularly in China.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Gerontology-
dc.subjectcross-national study-
dc.subjectlatent class analysis-
dc.subjectlong-term services and supports-
dc.subjectsource of care-
dc.titleWho Cares for Older Adults? A Cross-National Study of Care Sources for Older Adults With Functional Limitations and Associated Determinants-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/07334648241232759-
dc.identifier.pmid38355157-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85185495364-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-4523-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001162834000001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats